[1996] KECA 185 (KLR)

[1996] KECA 185 (KLR)

The Court found that the Notice of Appeal was not served on the respondent within the mandatory 7-day period as required by Rule 76 of the Court of Appeal Rules. There was no affidavit in reply or opposition from the respondent to dispute this fact. The breach of this mandatory procedural rule was sufficient to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1996] KECA 185 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Diamond Trust of (K) Ltd.; Respondent: Peter Odero Oor; Respondent: Maq's Motor Sales Ltd.
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 291 of 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Outcome
Notice of Appeal struck out for non-compliance with mandatory service requirements.
Legal Topics
Notice of Appeal, Service of Process, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Notice of Appeal Service of Process Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Diamond Trust of (K) Ltd.

Applicant

Peter Odero Oor

Respondent

Maq's Motor Sales Ltd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Notice of Appeal should be struck out for failure to serve it on the respondent within the prescribed 7 days under Rule 76 of the Court of Appeal Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the Notice of Appeal was not served on the respondent within the mandatory 7-day period as required by Rule 76 of the Court of Appeal Rules. There was no affidavit in reply or opposition from the respondent to dispute this fact. The breach of this mandatory procedural rule was sufficient to warrant the striking out of the Notice of Appeal. The Court also noted that the parties to the application were wrongly described, and therefore, made no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

Notice of Appeal struck out for non-compliance with mandatory service requirements.

Orders

  • The Notice of Appeal filed on 31st January, 1996 is hereby struck out.
  • There will be no order as to costs.