[2018] KEELC 550 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 550 (KLR)

The court found that the respondents were properly served with the application by way of advertisement in the Standard newspapers on 29th October 2018, as evidenced by the affidavit of service. There being no response from the respondents, the court was satisfied that service was effected in accordance with the law...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 550 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Dinah Nyabonyi Njeru; Defendant: Embakasi Ranching Co. Ltd; Defendant: The Hon. Attorney General; Defendant: The Registrar of Lands Nairobi; Defendant: Rahab Wanjiku
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 269 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
interlocutory application allowed (prayers 4, 6, and 7 granted)
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Interlocutory Applications, Notice of Motion
Source Language
en
Land and Property Service of Process Interlocutory Applications Notice of Motion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dinah Nyabonyi Njeru

Plaintiff

Embakasi Ranching Co. Ltd

Defendant

The Hon. Attorney General

Defendant

The Registrar of Lands Nairobi

Defendant

Rahab Wanjiku

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the respondents were properly served with the application as required by law.
  2. 2 Whether the court should grant prayers 4, 6, and 7 of the Notice of Motion dated 28th August 2018.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondents were properly served with the application by way of advertisement in the Standard newspapers on 29th October 2018, as evidenced by the affidavit of service. There being no response from the respondents, the court was satisfied that service was effected in accordance with the law and that the application was unopposed. Consequently, the court allowed prayers 4, 6, and 7 of the Notice of Motion dated 28th August 2018, with costs of the application to abide the outcome of the main suit.

Court Disposition

interlocutory application allowed (prayers 4, 6, and 7 granted)

Orders

  • Prayers 4, 6, and 7 of the Notice of Motion dated 28th August 2018 are allowed.
  • Costs of the application to abide the outcome of the main suit.