[2021] KEHC 2739 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had explained the delay in filing the appeal and that the delay was not inordinate. Recognizing the right to appeal, the court exercised its discretion to extend the time for filing the appeal by 15 days from the date of the ruling. The court also found it reasonable to grant a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 2739 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Dinah Kambua; Applicant: Peter Atuti; Respondent: Titus Wambua Maseki alias Wambua Maseki alias Wambua Masiki
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Garissa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous Application E009 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part.
- Judges
- A Ali-Aroni
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Security for Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dinah Kambua
Applicant
Peter Atuti
Applicant
Titus Wambua Maseki alias Wambua Maseki alias Wambua Masiki
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to extend time for filing of the appeal.
- 2 Whether to grant a stay of execution pending appeal.
- 3 Whether to accept the security offered by the applicants.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had explained the delay in filing the appeal and that the delay was not inordinate. Recognizing the right to appeal, the court exercised its discretion to extend the time for filing the appeal by 15 days from the date of the ruling. The court also found it reasonable to grant a stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, provided that the applicants furnish a bank guarantee of Kshs. 1 million as security, valid for one year. Costs were ordered to abide the outcome of the appeal.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part.
Orders
- Time for filing appeal extended by 15 days from the date of the ruling.
- Stay of execution granted pending appeal, subject to furnishing a bank guarantee of Kshs. 1 million valid for one year.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT GARISSA
CIVIL MISC. APPL. NO. E009 OF 2021
DINAN KAMBUA.................................1ST APPLICANT
PETER ATUTI.....................................2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
TITUS WAMBUA MASEKI
aliasWAMBUA MASEKIalias
WAMBUA MASIKI.............................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Before court is an application by way of a Notice of Motion dated 10th June 2021 by Dinah Kambua & Peter Atuti seeking for:-
· Leave to appeal out of time.
· Stay of execution; and
· To be allowed to furnish a bank guarantee as reasonable security.
2. The application is predicated on grounds that the 30 days within which to file an appeal have lapsed, the Applicants are aggrieved by the Judgement in Civil Suit No. 71 of 2019 and intend to appeal against the Judgement and should execution issue they are likely to suffer irreparable loss.
3. The application is opposed in a replying affidavit of Titus Wambua Maseki dated 23rd June, 2021 wherein he asserts that the application is incompetent and bad in law, no explanation has been given for the delay in preferring the appeal and the move is meant to frustrate the Respondent in realizing the fruits of the judgement in his favour.
4. Having considered the application, the replying affidavit and submissions by counsel there are three issues for consideration:
a)Whether or not to extent time for filing of the appeal.
b)Whether or not to grant a stay.
c)Whether or not to accept the security offered.
5. An appeal is ones right and the court should not be quick to deny a litigant an opportunity to ventilate his case. The delay in filing the appeal out of time has been explained, and the same is not inordinate. Consequently, therefore the time be an is hereby extended by 15 days of the date of this ruling.
6. In the intended appeal the Applicant has taken issue with the Judgement and the award which they assert is inordinately high. The sum is by no means a high figure and it would therefore be reasonable to allow a stay pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
In this regard;
a)A security of the sum of Kshs. 1 million by way of a bank guarantee which is valid for 1 year from the date of this ruling be furnished.
b)The appeal be filed within 15 days of the date hereof.
c)Costs to abide the outcome of the appeal.
DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT GARISSA THIS 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021.
.......................
ALI ARONI
JUDGE