https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/10385

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/10385

The Notice of Motion dated 15th January 2026 had already been dismissed for want of attendance by a judge of concurrent jurisdiction, so there was no live application before the court and the court was functus officio in respect of that motion. The court therefore marked the motion spent and only restated prior...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 10385 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Dinesh Chandulal Mokha; Respondent: Stephen Wangusi Fedha
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E103 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion / Case Management Directions
Outcome
Notice of Motion marked spent; prior directions on the appeal restated; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
["E Ominde"]
Legal Topics
Functus Officio, Dismissal for Want of Attendance, Subsisting Application, Restatement of Directions, Case Management Timelines
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appellate Practice Functus Officio Dismissal for Want of Attendance Subsisting Application Restatement of Directions Case Management Timelines

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dinesh Chandulal Mokha

Appellant

Stephen Wangusi Fedha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion / Case Management Directions

  1. 1 Whether the Notice of Motion dated 15th January 2026 was still pending for determination
  2. 2 Whether the court was functus officio in respect of the application after dismissal by a court of concurrent jurisdiction
  3. 3 What directions should govern the pending appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The Notice of Motion dated 15th January 2026 had already been dismissed for want of attendance by a judge of concurrent jurisdiction, so there was no live application before the court and the court was functus officio in respect of that motion. The court therefore marked the motion spent and only restated prior directions on the pending appeal.

Court Disposition

Notice of Motion marked spent; prior directions on the appeal restated; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • Notice of Motion dated 15th January 2026 is marked as spent.
  • Directions issued by Honourable Lady Justice Shariff on 27th January 2026 are restated and must be complied with from the date of this ruling.