[2019] KEELC 3772 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3772 (KLR)

The court found that the order presented to the Land Registrar, which purported to grant final relief at the interlocutory stage, was forged. This discovery fundamentally undermined the plaintiff's application for injunctive and other interim relief. The court held that no relief could be granted on the basis of a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 3772 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Dionecia Ciandeke; Defendant: Ndururu Nyaga
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 15 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Related Orders
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Customary Trusts, Injunctive Relief, Land Registration, Fraudulent Transfer
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Customary Trusts Injunctive Relief Land Registration Fraudulent Transfer

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dionecia Ciandeke

Plaintiff

Ndururu Nyaga

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Related Orders

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case for grant of temporary and permanent injunction restraining the defendant from dealing with the suit properties.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an order revoking, cancelling or deleting the defendant's name from the land register and substituting it with her own pending the hearing of the main suit.
  3. 3 Whether the court order presented to the Land Registrar was forged and the effect of such forgery on the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the order presented to the Land Registrar, which purported to grant final relief at the interlocutory stage, was forged. This discovery fundamentally undermined the plaintiff's application for injunctive and other interim relief. The court held that no relief could be granted on the basis of a forged order, regardless of the underlying merits of the plaintiff's claim to the land. Consequently, the application was dismissed, and the matter was referred to the County Director of Criminal Investigations for inquiry into the forgery. The court further directed both parties to comply with pre-trial procedures under Order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and set the main...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Registry to ensure that this file is kept under lock and key.
  • The application dated 13th December, 2018 is dismissed with costs in the cause.