[2023] KEHC 17657 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 17657 (KLR)

The court determined that, although applications for revision do not always require the participation of the opposing party, the circumstances of this case—specifically the contested nature of the proceedings in the lower court—necessitated that the respondents be given an opportunity to respond. To uphold the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 17657 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Director of Public Prosecution; Respondent: Wilberforce Ndula & 8 others
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E233 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Interlocutory Ruling on Directions and Service of Application
Outcome
Directions of 20.4.2023 set aside; substituted with orders for service, response, mention, and extension of stay.
Judges
SC Chirchir
Legal Topics
Criminal Revision Procedure, Service of Process, Right to Be Heard
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Criminal Revision Procedure Service of Process Right to Be Heard

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Public Prosecution

Applicant

Wilberforce Ndula & 8 others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Interlocutory Ruling on Directions and Service of Application

  1. 1 Whether the respondents should be given an opportunity to respond to the application for revision.
  2. 2 Whether the previous directions regarding delivery of ruling should be set aside to allow respondents to be heard.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, although applications for revision do not always require the participation of the opposing party, the circumstances of this case—specifically the contested nature of the proceedings in the lower court—necessitated that the respondents be given an opportunity to respond. To uphold the principles of fairness and natural justice, the court set aside its earlier directions regarding the delivery of the ruling and substituted them with new orders requiring service of the application on the respondents and provision for their responses. The stay of proceedings was extended pending the hearing and determination of the application.

Court Disposition

Directions of 20.4.2023 set aside; substituted with orders for service, response, mention, and extension of stay.

Orders

  • The directions given on 20.4.2023 are hereby set aside, limited as aforesaid.
  • The applicant to serve the notice of motion dated 21.3.2023 on the respondents within 3 days.