[2023] KEHC 25970 (KLR)
The court found that the accused had not shown genuine remorse, as he continued to deny responsibility for the offence, which weighed against the possibility of rehabilitation. However, the court considered the accused a first offender due to the absence of previous convictions, treating this as a mitigating factor....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 25970 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Director of Public Prosecution; Defendant: Milton Namatsi Wangenge alias Maji
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E004 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Accused sentenced to 30 years imprisonment.
- Judges
- SC Chirchir
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing, Mitigation, Remorse, First Offender, Pre Sentence Report
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecution
Applicant
Milton Namatsi Wangenge alias Maji
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be granted a non-custodial sentence given the circumstances of the offence and his personal mitigation.
- 2 Whether the lack of remorse by the accused should affect the severity of the sentence.
- 3 Whether being a first offender is a sufficient mitigating factor in sentencing for murder.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused had not shown genuine remorse, as he continued to deny responsibility for the offence, which weighed against the possibility of rehabilitation. However, the court considered the accused a first offender due to the absence of previous convictions, treating this as a mitigating factor. The pre-sentencing report highlighted the community's divided opinion and the victim's family's ongoing trauma and lack of forgiveness, especially given the unresolved land dispute linked to the murder. Balancing these factors, the court determined that a custodial sentence was warranted and imposed a 30-year prison term, commencing from the date of remand.
Court Disposition
Accused sentenced to 30 years imprisonment.
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to 30 years imprisonment, to run from 24th February 2023.
- Right of appeal within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Director of Public Prosecution v Wangenge (Criminal Case E004 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 25970 (KLR) (30 November 2023) (Sentence)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 25970 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kakamega
Criminal Case E004 of 2022
SC Chirchir, J
November 30, 2023
Between
Director of Public Prosecution
Republic
and
Milton Namatsi Wangenge alias Maji
Accused
Sentence
1. Milton Namatsi Wangenge alias Maji was convicted of the murder of Isaac Juma Onyango, on 2nd June 2023 by Justice W. Musyoka.
2. The Judge then directed the Director of Probation and After care services – Kakamega County to make a report (hereinafter referred to as he pre- sentencing report) touching on the antecedents of the accused, the views of the victim’s family and the community. Following the filing of the said report, sentencing hearing was conducted on 29. 9.2023.
Accused’s Submissions 3. Through his counsel Ms Lucheli, the accused told the court that he was remorseful; that the time he has been in custody has been a time of learning lessons. He prays for a non-custodial sentence, to give him a chance to take care of his young family
Prosecution’s Submissions 4. Ms. Osoro, for the state refuted the submissions that the accused was remorseful, pointing out that as by per the pre-sentencing report, the accused is still denying that he committed the crime. It is her contention that a person without remorse is incapable of being rehabilitated. She prayed for a severe sentence.
Pre-Sentencing Report 5. According to the presentencing report, there is divergence of opinion amongst the community members about the accused being considered for a non- custodial sentence. As for the victim’s family, they are reported to still be unforgiving. They have had to move away from their home of fear of further victimization, as the murder herein was related to a land dispute which remains unresolved.
6. The accused has a history of aggression, and apparently, the assault leading to the deceased’s death was not the first to be afflicted on the deceased, by the accused.
7. According to the Local Administration, the accused was known for anti-social behavior. His wife and 2 children had left prior to the incident and the children were under the care of their maternal grandmother.
8. I agree with the prosecution that the Accused has not shown any remorse. However, I will consider him a first offender, as there is no evidence of a previous conviction. Being a first offender is a mitigating factor.
9. Taking the aforegoing into consideration, I hereby sentence the accused to 30 years in prison. The sentence will run from 24th februray 2023 being the date he was remanded.
10. Right of Appeal- 14 days.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KAKAMEGA THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023S. CHIRCHIRJUDGEIn the presence of:-Ms Lucheli for the AccusedNo appearance by DPP