[2024] KEHC 2250 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, through the testimonies of four witnesses, established a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder. Applying the standard from Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt v R, the evidence was deemed sufficient that a reasonable tribunal could convict if no explanation was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 2250 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Director of Public Prosecutions; Respondent: Julius Kiambi Mutwerandu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 65 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer After Close of Prosecution Case
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer and placed on his defence.
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Applicant
Julius Kiambi Mutwerandu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer After Close of Prosecution Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant him being placed on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, through the testimonies of four witnesses, established a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder. Applying the standard from Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt v R, the evidence was deemed sufficient that a reasonable tribunal could convict if no explanation was offered by the defence. Consequently, the accused was found to have a case to answer and was placed on his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 50(2) of the Constitution.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer and placed on his defence.
Orders
- Accused Julius Kiambi Mutwerandu is found to have a case to answer and is placed on his defence.
- Provisions of Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 50(2)(i)(j)(k) of the Constitution explained to the accused in the presence of his advocate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Director of Public Prosecutions v Mutwerandu (Criminal Case 65 of 2018) [2024] KEHC 2250 (KLR) (29 February 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 2250 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Meru
Criminal Case 65 of 2018
TW Cherere, J
February 29, 2024
Between
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecution
and
Julius Kiambi Mutwerandu
Accused
Ruling
1. Julius Kiambi Mutwerandu (Accused) is charged with the offence of Murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code in that he murdered one Antony Gitonga on 14th May,2018 in Nkombe village, Chre Location, Imenti South Sub County within Meru County.
2. Accused has denied committing the offence of Murder as charged and the prosecution has called a total of four witnesses and closed its case on 20th February, 2024.
3. This court is therefore called upon to determine whether, at this stage, based on the evidence adduced by the four prosecution witnesses, the prosecution has established a prima facie case to warrant the accused person to be placed on his defence.
4. In Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt v R [1957] E.A 332 at 335, the court stated as follows:“……..It may not be easy to define what is meant by a, “prima facie case”, but at least it must mean one on which a reasonable, properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence could convict if no explanation is offered by the defence”.
5. Having considered the testimonies of the four prosecution witnesses, I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been established against to warrant Accused to be placed on his defence. I therefore find that the accused herein Julius Kiambi Mutwerandu has a case to answer and is therefore placed on his defence.
6. The provisions of Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 50(2)(i)(j)(k) of theConstitution are hereby explained to the accused person in the presence of his advocate Mrs. Ntarangwi.
DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024WAMAE. T. W. CHEREREJUDGEAppearancesCourt Assistants - Kinoti/MuneneAccused - PresentFor the Accused - Ms. Athieno AdvocateFor the State - Ms. Rita Rotich (PC 1)