[2014] KEHC 6497 (KLR)
The court found that the divorce petition was filed prematurely, as it was presented before the expiry of three years from the date of marriage, contrary to section 6 of the Matrimonial Causes Act. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the petitioner had obtained leave of court to file the petition before the lapse of the statutory period. The absence of such leave rendered the petition incompetent and premature, necessitating its striking out.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 6497 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: D K I; Respondent: T S M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2014
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 65 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition struck out as premature and incompetent
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Divorce Petition, Matrimonial Causes Act, Premature Filing, Leave of Court Requirement
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D K I
Petitioner
T S M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the divorce petition was filed in contravention of section 6 of the Matrimonial Causes Act.
- 2 Whether leave of court was obtained to file the petition before expiry of three years from the date of marriage.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the divorce petition was filed prematurely, as it was presented before the expiry of three years from the date of marriage, contrary to section 6 of the Matrimonial Causes Act. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the petitioner had obtained leave of court to file the petition before the lapse of the statutory period. The absence of such leave rendered the petition incompetent and premature, necessitating its striking out.
Court Disposition
petition struck out as premature and incompetent
Orders
- The petition is struck out.
- There will be no orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment