[2023] KEHC 17226 (KLR)
The court found that both the original lower court file (Nyando SPM Criminal Case No 659 of 2013) and the High Court appeal file (HCRA No 92 of 2013) had disappeared and could not be traced or reconstructed despite repeated efforts. As a result, there was no record upon which the court could base any meaningful...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 17226 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: DOM; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition 50 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Ruling on Petition Seeking Retrieval of Lost Court Records
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Incest Offence, Lost Court Records, Retrial Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DOM
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Ruling on Petition Seeking Retrieval of Lost Court Records
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can grant orders for retrieval of lost court records in Nyando SPM Criminal Case No 659 of 2013.
- 2 Whether the petition can be allowed in light of the disappearance of both the lower court and High Court files.
- 3 Whether any effective orders can be made when the original files are missing.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that both the original lower court file (Nyando SPM Criminal Case No 659 of 2013) and the High Court appeal file (HCRA No 92 of 2013) had disappeared and could not be traced or reconstructed despite repeated efforts. As a result, there was no record upon which the court could base any meaningful orders or determine the petition on its merits. The court had already ordered a retrial of the petitioner for the same offence before a different court. Therefore, granting the orders sought in the petition would be futile, as the subject matter (the lost files) was irretrievable. The petition was dismissed on the basis that the court cannot make orders in vain.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- The petition is dismissed.
- The file is hereby closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
DOM v Republic (Criminal Petition 50 of 2019) [2023] KEHC 17226 (KLR) (4 May 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 17226 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Criminal Petition 50 of 2019
RE Aburili, J
May 4, 2023
Between
DOM
Petitioner
and
Republic
Respondent
(From the original conviction and sentence in Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court Sexual Offences Case No 659 of 2013 at Nyando)
Ruling
1. This Criminal Petition was filed in this court on September 26, 2019. The Petitioner DOM is a convict serving life imprisonment at Kisumu Maximum prison following his conviction for the offence of incest contrary to Section 20(3) of the Sexual Offences Act, vide Nyando Senior Principal Magistrate Sexual Offences Case No 659 of 2013.
2. He then filed his appeal to this court vide HCRA No 92 of 2013 but the appeal could not be heard on merit owing to the disappearance of the lower court file which has never been availed to this court from 2019 despite the many letters, reminders and orders issued to Nyando Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court.
3. In addition, orders for reconstruction of the police file which also appeared missing did not bear fruit and it was only discovered that the Petitioner had been processed by Pap Onditi Police station which was being directed all along to reconstruct the police investigation file.
4. Yesterday on May 3, 2023, I delivered a ruling in HCCRA No 92 of 2013 closing that appeal file and directing the Appellant to be released and handed over to Pap Onditi Police station to be charged afresh with the offence of incest and this time, not before Nyando Law Courts, but before Kisumu Chief Magistrate’s Court.
5. The Petitioner herein was seeking for retrieval of the court records in Nyando SPM Criminal Case No 659 of 2013. The evidence contained in the Criminal Appeal No 92 of 2013 is clear that the above original court file could not be traced even in the archives meaning, the court file is lost and Nyando SPM’s Court were unable to explain how the file disappeared after Judgment, conviction and sentencing.
6. In addition, even the High Court original appeal file also disappeared and only the skeleton file was available for me to make orders on. It is not clear when the skeleton file was opened as there is no record of the same for noting.
7. No doubt, an evil hand played a role in the mysterious vanishing of the lower court file and High Court file. In the High Court Appeal file, not even a petition of appeal was traceable hence the court had nothing to work with to determine the appeal on merit.
8. Having ordered for a retrial of the convict for the same offence, and having found that the Nyando SPM’s Criminal Case No 659 of 2013 cannot be traced, neither could the original High Court Criminal Appeal No 92 of 2013 case file be traced, I find that this Petition cannot be allowed as it would be making orders in vain.
9. Accordingly, although the Petition was well intended to expedite justice, the orders sought are incapable of being granted. The Petition is therefore dismissed.
10. This file is hereby closed.
11. I so order.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 4TH DAY OF MAY, 2023R. E. ABURILIJUDGE