[2009] KEHC 2798 (KLR)
The court found that the omission in the original judgment regarding the period for which repatriation expenses and wages were awarded constituted an accidental slip. The slip rule, as articulated in the English Civil Procedure Rules, grants the court inherent power to correct such errors to ensure its orders...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 2798 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Dominador Balon and 9 others; Defendant: The Owners of the Motor Ship 'Royal Star'
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Admiralty Claim 2 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Admiralty Claim / Ruling on Application to Amend Judgment
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Slip Rule, Amendment of Judgment, Discretion of Court, Repatriation Expenses, Wages Claim, Costs of Application
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dominador Balon and 9 others
Plaintiff
The Owners of the Motor Ship 'Royal Star'
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Admiralty Claim / Ruling on Application to Amend Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has discretion to amend its judgment to correct an accidental slip or omission.
- 2 Whether the slip rule applies to admiralty matters as in ordinary civil matters.
- 3 Whether the claimants are entitled to the additional sums for repatriation expenses and wages up to 30.9.2008.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the omission in the original judgment regarding the period for which repatriation expenses and wages were awarded constituted an accidental slip. The slip rule, as articulated in the English Civil Procedure Rules, grants the court inherent power to correct such errors to ensure its orders accurately reflect its intention. The court was satisfied that the applicants had identified the mistake and properly set out the required correction. There being no objection from the respondent and the application being meritorious, the court exercised its discretion to amend the judgment to include the additional sums for the extended period and awarded costs of the application.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- The judgment delivered on 28th July 2008 is amended to provide for judgment in the sum of USD39,256.00.
- The application without notice is further amended to reflect the additional sum of USD24,994.40 plus costs of USD1,100.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
Admiralty Claim 2 of 2008
DOMINADOR BALON AND 9 OTHERS ……………............…….PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
THE OWNERS OFTHE MOTOR SHIP “ROYAL STAR”…DEFENDANTS
R U L I N G
The Claimants herein, took out an application without Notice dated 7th November 2008 in which they prayed for the judgment given in this claim on 28th July 2008 pursuant to the application dated 23/7/2008 to be amended to provide for judgment in the sum of USD39,256. 00. They also prayed for costs of the application. The application sets out the grounds it is based. The same is supported by the affidavit of Mr. Kinyua Kamundi sworn on 10th November 2008.
When the application came up for hearing, Mr. Khagram, learned advocate for the claimant in claim No. 11 of 2008 and for the Cautioner in caution No. 8 of 2008 with Mr. Kinyua Kamundi learned advocate for the claimants in this application recorded a consent to amend the application without notice dated 7. 11. 2008. This court approved the consent whose effect is to have the application without notice to reflect the additional sum of USD24,994. 4 plus costs of USD1,100.
Mr. Kinyua learned advocate urged this court to allow the application amended as prayed. He relied on the grounds set out on the face of the application and the facts he deponed in his affidavit sworn on 10th November 2008. Mr. Khagram did not object to the application because he felt this court had the discretion to grant the orders prayed.
I have considered the grounds set out on the face of the application without notice and the facts deponed in the affidavit of Mr. Kinyua Kamundi. I have also examined the relevant procedure stated in the English Civil Procedure. I have referred to Vol.1 of the English Civil Procedure Rules, [2001] Edition Part 40 para 40. 12. It is apparent from aforesaid provisions that this court has a wide discretion to correct an accidental slip or omission in a judgment or order upon receiving an application without notice. In a nutshell the slip rule is applicable in admiralty matters too just like in ordinary Civil Matters where the court retains the inherent power to vary its own orders to make the meaning and intention of the court clear. When an application without notice is made, the applicant must describe the error and proceed to set out the correction or amendment required. The applicants in this claim have pointed out the mistake. It is said that the judgment was entered for the claimants in respect of repatriation expenses and wages up to 30. .6. 2008 instead of up to 30. 9.2008. The mistake was only detected when the claimants started complaining of underpayment. It was discovered that a mistake was made in the judgment. After a careful consideration of the arguments put forward by learned counsels and after taking into account the material placed before me I am convinced the application has merit. I grant the orders sought in the application without notice dated 7. 11. 2008 as amended by the consent order recorded and approved by this court on 17. 11. 2008.
Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 13th day of March 2009.
J.K. SERGON
J U D G E
In open court in the presence of Miss Ileli h/b Khagram for the claimant.
N/A for defendant