[2016] KEELC 52 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 52 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to present any valid grounds to justify the transfer of the suit, which was already pending judgment in the lower court. The transfer order had been made by a court of concurrent jurisdiction, and the application before the court was not for review or setting aside of that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELC 52 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Domic Nyamema Gor; Respondent: Michael Obara Ajuonga; Respondent: David Otieno Amoi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 144 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Transfer Suit From Lower Court to the Environment and Land Court
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Transfer of Suit, Jurisdiction of Courts, Procedural Irregularities
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Transfer of Suit Jurisdiction of Courts Procedural Irregularities

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Domic Nyamema Gor

Applicant

Michael Obara Ajuonga

Respondent

David Otieno Amoi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Transfer Suit From Lower Court to the Environment and Land Court

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established sufficient grounds for the transfer of the suit from the lower court to the Environment and Land Court.
  2. 2 Who should bear the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to present any valid grounds to justify the transfer of the suit, which was already pending judgment in the lower court. The transfer order had been made by a court of concurrent jurisdiction, and the application before the court was not for review or setting aside of that order. The court emphasized that if any party was aggrieved by the transfer, the appropriate remedy would have been an appeal to the Court of Appeal, not an application to the same level of court. Consequently, the application was dismissed as lacking merit.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The applicant's notice of motion dated 16th July 2014 is dismissed with costs.