[2021] KEELRC 1995 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1995 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated a prima facie case with a probability of success, as they provided credible evidence of their union membership through pay slips and inclusion in the official register signed by the assistant secretary. The 3rd respondent's counter-list was unauthenticated and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1995 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dr. Dominic Murage; Applicant: Dr. Hassan Kinyua; Applicant: Dr. Prisca Jerongo; Applicant: Dr. Thomas Ongoro Ombati; Applicant: Dr. Njagi Njomo; Respondent: Richard M. Bosire; Respondent: Jane Wambui; Respondent: George Omondi; Respondent: James Kanya; Respondent: Owiti Kakumu; Respondent: Maloba Wekesa; Respondent: Universities Academic Staff Union (UON Chapter)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E188 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Injunction Application / Ruling on Interim Injunction Pending Hearing and Determination of Suit
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Trade Union Elections, Freedom of Association, Union Membership Registers, Interim Injunctions
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Trade Union Elections Freedom of Association Union Membership Registers Interim Injunctions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr. Dominic Murage

Applicant

Dr. Hassan Kinyua

Applicant

Dr. Prisca Jerongo

Applicant

Dr. Thomas Ongoro Ombati

Applicant

Dr. Njagi Njomo

Applicant

Richard M. Bosire

Respondent

Jane Wambui

Respondent

George Omondi

Respondent

James Kanya

Respondent

Owiti Kakumu

Respondent

Maloba Wekesa

Respondent

Universities Academic Staff Union (UON Chapter)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Injunction Application / Ruling on Interim Injunction Pending Hearing and Determination of Suit

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have satisfied the requirements for issuance of an interim injunction pending the hearing and determination of the case.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants are bona fide members of the 7th respondent and entitled to participate in the union elections.
  3. 3 Whether the actions of the 3rd respondent in issuing a separate register and notice unlawfully disenfranchised the applicants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated a prima facie case with a probability of success, as they provided credible evidence of their union membership through pay slips and inclusion in the official register signed by the assistant secretary. The 3rd respondent's counter-list was unauthenticated and less persuasive. The court held that the applicants would suffer irreparable harm by being excluded from the elections, amounting to a violation of their constitutional right to freedom of association. The balance of convenience favored allowing all eligible members to participate in the elections scheduled for 18/3/2021, with any grievances to be addressed subsequently....

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • An order of interim injunction is issued restraining the respondents, their servants, or agents or any person acting on their behest from proceeding with the entire process of elections vide the notice dated 15/1/2021 and scheduled to take place on 15th March 2021.
  • The elections of the 7th respondent are to proceed and be conducted based on the inclusive register of members issued vide letter dated 9/1/2021 and based on the notice dated 11th February, 2021, to take place on 18th March, 2021.