Nyaundi v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E144 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 8956 (KLR) (11 June 2026) (Ruling)

Nyaundi v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E144 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 8956 (KLR) (11 June 2026) (Ruling)

The court found that the applicant had been in custody for a cumulative period of 5 years, 11 months, and 17 days before and around conviction and sentencing, and that this period should have been factored into the 20-year sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The sentence was therefore...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 8956 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dominic Muringe Nyaundi; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E144 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Ruling
Outcome
Application allowed.
Judges
["Sifuna Nixon"]
Legal Topics
Sentence Review, Custody Period Deduction, Section 333(2) Criminal Procedure Code, Murder Conviction Sentencing
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Procedure Sentence Review Custody Period Deduction Section 333(2) Criminal Procedure Code Murder Conviction Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dominic Muringe Nyaundi

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's sentence should be reviewed to account for time spent in remand custody.
  2. 2 Whether the custodial period prior to sentencing was properly taken into account under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had been in custody for a cumulative period of 5 years, 11 months, and 17 days before and around conviction and sentencing, and that this period should have been factored into the 20-year sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The sentence was therefore ordered to take account of that custody period.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • The period spent in custody, calculated as 5 years 11 months and 17 days, shall be taken into account in computing the applicant's sentence.