[2019] KEELRC 2187 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 2187 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent's conduct of sending the claimant on indefinite compulsory leave without pay, and failing to recall him or pay his salary, amounted to constructive and unfair dismissal. The respondent's assertion that the claimant was still employed was untenable as no payment had been made. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 2187 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Dominic Musyoka Katiso; Respondent: FSI Capital Limited formerly known as Consumer Credit Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 391 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment_for_claimant
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Constructive Dismissal, Statutory Deductions, Compulsory Leave, Service Pay, Notice Pay
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Constructive Dismissal Statutory Deductions Compulsory Leave Service Pay Notice Pay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dominic Musyoka Katiso

Claimant

FSI Capital Limited formerly known as Consumer Credit Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was constructively and unfairly dismissed from employment.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent failed to remit statutory deductions (NSSF, NHIF, pension) as required by law.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation, unpaid leave, notice pay, and other reliefs sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent's conduct of sending the claimant on indefinite compulsory leave without pay, and failing to recall him or pay his salary, amounted to constructive and unfair dismissal. The respondent's assertion that the claimant was still employed was untenable as no payment had been made. The respondent also failed to remit statutory deductions as required by law. The claimant was therefore entitled to compensation for unfair dismissal, unpaid leave, notice pay, costs, and payment of all outstanding NSSF deductions. The claim for severance pay was not proved and was denied.

Court Disposition

judgment_for_claimant

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant 3 months salary for unpaid leave for 3 years (Kshs. 36,000).
  • Respondent to pay claimant one month salary in lieu of notice (Kshs. 12,000).