[2013] KEHC 3111 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 3111 (KLR)

The court held that the sentence imposed on the applicant, being a fine of Kshs.20,000 in default three months imprisonment for a misdemeanour under section 243(d) of the Penal Code, was within the statutory limits. The Penal Code defines a misdemeanour as an offence not punishable by three years or more, and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 3111 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dominic Mutua Nzioka; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 9 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Revision
Outcome
application for revision dismissed
Judges
BT Jaden
Legal Topics
Sentencing Principles, Misdemeanour Definition, Penal Code Interpretation
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Principles Misdemeanour Definition Penal Code Interpretation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dominic Mutua Nzioka

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Revision

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant was harsh or unlawful under section 243(d) of the Penal Code.
  2. 2 Whether the default imprisonment term for non-payment of the fine was within the law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the sentence imposed on the applicant, being a fine of Kshs.20,000 in default three months imprisonment for a misdemeanour under section 243(d) of the Penal Code, was within the statutory limits. The Penal Code defines a misdemeanour as an offence not punishable by three years or more, and the sentence imposed did not exceed this threshold. Furthermore, section 28(2) of the Penal Code provides that a fine of Kshs.20,000 attracts a default sentence of three to six months imprisonment, making the default term lawful. The court found no basis to interfere with the sentence, concluding that it was neither harsh nor unlawful.

Court Disposition

application for revision dismissed

Orders

  • The application for revision is dismissed.