[2020] KEHC 6705 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 6705 (KLR)

The court found that while the petitioners have a constitutional right to freedom of worship, this right must be balanced against the public interest in controlling the spread of Covid-19. The court granted interim orders permitting alternative forms of worship, such as broadcasting church services, provided that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 6705 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Don Mutugi Manjau; Applicant: Joan Miriti; Applicant: Alex Gichunge; Respondent: Attorney General; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary for Interior & Coordination; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary for Health; Respondent: Inspector General of Police; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary for Information & Technology
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 131 (Covid 128) of 2020
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application (ex Parte Orders)
Outcome
Interim orders granted ex parte, subject to compliance with government Covid-19 directives.
Legal Topics
Freedom of Worship, Covid 19 Regulations, Interim Injunctions
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Freedom of Worship Covid 19 Regulations Interim Injunctions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Don Mutugi Manjau

Applicant

Joan Miriti

Applicant

Alex Gichunge

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

Cabinet Secretary for Interior & Coordination

Respondent

Cabinet Secretary for Health

Respondent

Inspector General of Police

Respondent

Cabinet Secretary for Information & Technology

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application (ex Parte Orders)

  1. 1 Whether the petitioners are entitled to interim orders permitting alternative forms of worship during the Covid-19 pandemic.
  2. 2 Whether government directives on public gatherings infringe on the petitioners' constitutional rights to worship.
  3. 3 Whether the court should issue guidelines or direct the respondents to issue guidelines for safe worship practices during the pandemic.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the petitioners have a constitutional right to freedom of worship, this right must be balanced against the public interest in controlling the spread of Covid-19. The court granted interim orders permitting alternative forms of worship, such as broadcasting church services, provided that such activities do not breach existing government directives or regulations. The court emphasized that the order does not permit physical gatherings or any conduct contrary to the Covid-19 regulations. The respondents were directed to be served and to respond within seven days, and the matter was set for mention to confirm compliance.

Court Disposition

Interim orders granted ex parte, subject to compliance with government Covid-19 directives.

Orders

  • Alternative forms of worship such as broadcasting church services may proceed through online or social media or any other accessible platform, provided there is no breach of government directives or regulations.
  • Respondents to be served with this court order and to file their responses within 7 days.