[2015] KEELRC 1622 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 1622 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was employed by the 1st respondent under a valid contract, which was admitted by the 3rd respondent. The respondents failed to pay the claimant his salary for the period worked, except for a part payment of Ksh.10,000. The 1st and 2nd respondents did not contest the claim. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 1622 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Donald Oricho; Respondent: The National Vision Party; Respondent: Nicholas K. Biwott; Respondent: Benter Akinyi Opande
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 26 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed as uncontested; judgment entered for the claimant.
Legal Topics
Employment Contracts, Salary Arrears, Breach of Contract
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Employment Contracts Salary Arrears Breach of Contract

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Donald Oricho

Claimant

The National Vision Party

Respondent

Nicholas K. Biwott

Respondent

Benter Akinyi Opande

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was employed by the respondents under a valid contract of employment.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents failed to pay the claimant his salary as agreed in the contract.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to arrears of salary and other reliefs sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was employed by the 1st respondent under a valid contract, which was admitted by the 3rd respondent. The respondents failed to pay the claimant his salary for the period worked, except for a part payment of Ksh.10,000. The 1st and 2nd respondents did not contest the claim. The court held that the claimant was entitled to arrears of salary amounting to Ksh.188,000 for February to December 2012, with interest at court rates from the date of filing until payment in full, and costs of the suit. The liability was held to be joint and several among the respondents.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed as uncontested; judgment entered for the claimant.

Orders

  • The respondents jointly and severally to pay the claimant Ksh.188,000 as arrear salary for February to December 2012.
  • The sum is payable with interest at court rates from the date of filing until payment in full.