[2023] KEHC 3480 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 3480 (KLR)

The court found that the record of appeal filed by the appellants was incomplete because it omitted the oral evidence of the respondent recorded on May 21, 2019. The handwritten notes containing this evidence, found at pages 5 to 9 of the original trial court record, were not legible to the presiding judge. As a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 3480 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Shitemi Shikuku Donnie; Appellant: Nahashon Tindi Musotsi; Respondent: Wilfred Alusa (suing as legal representative of the estate of Pamela Vomoji Ishuga, deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E10 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Completeness of Record of Appeal
Outcome
Appellants directed to file a complete record of appeal; judgment deferred.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Record of Appeal, Appellate Practice, Incomplete Record
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Record of Appeal Appellate Practice Incomplete Record

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shitemi Shikuku Donnie

Appellant

Nahashon Tindi Musotsi

Appellant

Wilfred Alusa (suing as legal representative of the estate of Pamela Vomoji Ishuga, deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Completeness of Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the record of appeal filed by the appellants is complete and sufficient for the determination of the appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the omission of oral evidence from the record of appeal affects the court's ability to proceed with the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the record of appeal filed by the appellants was incomplete because it omitted the oral evidence of the respondent recorded on May 21, 2019. The handwritten notes containing this evidence, found at pages 5 to 9 of the original trial court record, were not legible to the presiding judge. As a result, the court determined that it could not proceed to hear and determine the appeal on the basis of an incomplete record. The appellants were therefore directed to file a complete record of appeal, after which the matter would be set down for judgment by the judge's successors at Kakamega.

Court Disposition

Appellants directed to file a complete record of appeal; judgment deferred.

Orders

  • Appellants shall file a complete record of appeal.
  • Judgment to be delivered by successors at Kakamega after filing of complete record.