[2015] KEHC 1225 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1225 (KLR)

The court found that since the suit had been withdrawn by consent of the parties, there was no longer any basis for the inhibition order placed on Land Parcel No. NTIMA/NTAKIRA/2847. The parties had agreed by consent to the withdrawal of the suit and the lifting of the inhibition, with no order as to costs. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 1225 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Doris Makena; Defendant: Lucy Kanyua
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 109 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Lift Inhibition Following Withdrawal of Suit
Outcome
Application allowed by consent; inhibition order lifted; no order as to costs.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Suit, Inhibition Orders, Land Title, Consent Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Withdrawal of Suit Inhibition Orders Land Title Consent Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Doris Makena

Plaintiff

Lucy Kanyua

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Lift Inhibition Following Withdrawal of Suit

  1. 1 Whether the inhibition order placed on Land Parcel No. NTIMA/NTAKIRA/2847 should be lifted following the withdrawal of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether any party is entitled to costs after the withdrawal and lifting of the inhibition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the suit had been withdrawn by consent of the parties, there was no longer any basis for the inhibition order placed on Land Parcel No. NTIMA/NTAKIRA/2847. The parties had agreed by consent to the withdrawal of the suit and the lifting of the inhibition, with no order as to costs. The court adopted the consent as its order, thereby cancelling the inhibition and confirming that there would be no order as to costs. The fundamental reasoning was that the withdrawal of the suit extinguished the substratum for the inhibition, and the parties' consent provided a just and final resolution to the matter.

Court Disposition

Application allowed by consent; inhibition order lifted; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The inhibition placed against Land Parcel No. NTIMA/NTAKIRA/2847 is hereby lifted and/or cancelled.
  • There is no order as to costs.