[2025] KEHC 3820 (KLR)

The court allowed the application dated 20th January 2025 on the basis that it was unopposed and there was no reason to refuse it. The court exercised its discretion in favour of the applicants, permitting the matter to proceed to the next procedural stage, namely the filing of the Record of Appeal and directions...

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2025] KEHC 3820 (KLR)
Parties: Appellant: Peter Lari Doto; Appellant: Gabriel Abeid Doto; Respondent: Dakan Bare Abdille
Court: High Court
Court Station: High Court at Voi
Jurisdiction: Kenya
Case Number: Civil Appeal E035 of 2024
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Leave/record of Appeal
Outcome: Application allowed; directions given for further conduct of the appeal.
Judges: AN Ongeri
Legal Topics: Unopposed Application, Leave to Appeal, Record of Appeal, Appeal Procedure
Source Language: en

Civil Procedure Unopposed Application Leave to Appeal Record of Appeal Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Peter Lari Doto

Appellant

Gabriel Abeid Doto

Appellant

Dakan Bare Abdille

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Leave/record of Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the unopposed application dated 20th January 2025 should be allowed.

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application allowed; directions given for further conduct of the appeal.

Orders

The application dated 20th January 2025 is allowed.
Mention on 4th June 2025 for filing Record of Appeal and for directions on the hearing of the appeal.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.