[2014] KEHC 855 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 855 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient cause for the renewal and extension of the validity of summons, as numerous attempts to serve the defendant personally had failed and the defendant could not be traced. The law under Order 5 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules allows for such extension...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 855 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Douglas Mogire Mekenya, Charges Ondieki Nyambui Training As Shipwright Solutions 7 Logistics & Shipflight Solutions & Logistics ICN; Defendant: Alexander Mukanga Omindo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 363 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Renewal and Extension of Summons, and Substituted Service
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Renewal of Summons, Substituted Service, Service of Process, Extension of Time
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Renewal of Summons Substituted Service Service of Process Extension of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Douglas Mogire Mekenya, Charges Ondieki Nyambui Training As Shipwright Solutions 7 Logistics & Shipflight Solutions & Logistics ICN

Plaintiff

Alexander Mukanga Omindo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Renewal and Extension of Summons, and Substituted Service

  1. 1 Whether the court should renew and extend the validity of summons for another 12 months.
  2. 2 Whether the court should allow substituted service on the defendant via local daily newspapers.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient cause for the renewal and extension of the validity of summons, as numerous attempts to serve the defendant personally had failed and the defendant could not be traced. The law under Order 5 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules allows for such extension upon application. Further, the court held that substituted service by advertisement in a local daily newspaper is appropriate where personal service is impracticable, as provided under Order 5 Rule 17. The application was unopposed, and the court was satisfied that granting the orders sought would not prejudice the defendant and would serve the interests of justice. Accordingly,...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The summons herein are renewed and their validity extended for another 12 months.
  • The defendant shall be served by way of substituted service in any one of the local daily newspapers, i.e., the Daily Nation or Standard Newspaper.