[2021] KEHC 3583 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner had already exercised his right of appeal before the High Court, which dismissed his appeal. Since the High Court is a court of concurrent jurisdiction, it cannot review or supervise the decision of another High Court. The petitioner did not demonstrate any infringement of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 3583 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Douglas Otieno Okumu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Migori
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition E018 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Judges
- RPV Wendoh
- Legal Topics
- Grievous Harm, Sentencing, Abuse of Court Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Douglas Otieno Okumu
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review or reduce the sentence after dismissal of appeal by a court of concurrent jurisdiction.
- 2 Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were infringed to warrant intervention by the court.
- 3 Whether the petition amounts to an abuse of the court process.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner had already exercised his right of appeal before the High Court, which dismissed his appeal. Since the High Court is a court of concurrent jurisdiction, it cannot review or supervise the decision of another High Court. The petitioner did not demonstrate any infringement of constitutional rights that would justify the court's intervention. The proper avenue for further recourse is the Court of Appeal. Therefore, the petition was deemed an abuse of the court process and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- The petition is dismissed as an abuse of the court process.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MIGORI
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. E018 OF 2021
DOUGLAS OTIENO OKUMU..................APPELLANT
-VERSUS-
REPUBLIC..............................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The PetitionerDouglas Otieno Okumu,was convicted and sentenced to twenty (20) years imprisonment by Senior Resident Magistrate Rongo in Criminal Case No. 182 of 2018 for the offence of grievous harm contrary to Section 234 of the Penal Code and was sentenced to twenty (20) years imprisonment.
He was dissatisfied with the said judgment and appealed to the High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 62 of 2018. J. Mrima dismissed the Appeal.
The Petitioner has now filed this Petition pursuant to Articles 23, 25, 27(1)(2)(4)50(2), 159 and 165(3) of the Constitution. His prays that the court do exercise leniency and reduce his sentence; that he has reformed from the programmes he has undertaken in prison.
Mr. Kimanthi opposed the petition and urged the petition is an abuse of the Court process and that if the petitioner has any recourse, he should move to the Court of Appeal.
Although the petitioner invoked the Articles of the Constitution he did not allude to any Constitutional right that has been infringed.
The petitioner was heard on appeal by the High Court, which is a court of concurrent jurisdiction. This court cannot exercise supervisory jurisdiction over another High Court. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he should move to the Court of Appeal.
In the end, I find this petition to be an abuse of the court process. It is hereby dismissed
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT MIGORI THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021.
R. WENDOH
JUDGE