[2000] KECA 352 (KLR)

[2000] KECA 352 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal held that the application by the appellant to set aside the dismissal order was incompetent because it was brought under Order IXB rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which did not apply to the circumstances of the dismissal. The court found no evidence that the Commissioner of Assize failed to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] KECA 352 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Dover Insurance Agency Ltd; Respondent: UAP Provincial Insurance Company Ltd
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 240 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Striking Out of Pleadings, Dismissal for Nonattendance, Setting Aside Orders, Exercise of Judicial Discretion
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Striking Out of Pleadings Dismissal for Nonattendance Setting Aside Orders Exercise of Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dover Insurance Agency Ltd

Appellant

UAP Provincial Insurance Company Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the High Court properly exercised its discretion in refusing to set aside the dismissal order for nonattendance.
  2. 2 Whether the application to set aside the dismissal order was competent under Order IXB rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the application by the appellant to set aside the dismissal order was incompetent because it was brought under Order IXB rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which did not apply to the circumstances of the dismissal. The court found no evidence that the Commissioner of Assize failed to consider relevant matters or considered irrelevant matters in exercising her discretion. Consequently, there was no basis for appellate interference, and the appeal lacked merit.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.