[2012] KEHC 5729 (KLR)
The court found that the respondents failed to comply with its orders to file a replying affidavit and provide information necessary for the petitioners to consider their options. The court emphasized the constitutional right of every citizen to challenge actions under the law and the duty of State institutions to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 5729 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Dr. Kimpei Munei & 59 Others (suing on their own behalf and on behalf of the Maa community and other minority and marginalised groups in Kenya and in the general public interest); Respondent: The National Land Commission Selection Panel; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 266 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders
- Outcome
- Conservatory orders granted; respondents directed to file and serve replying affidavit by specified date.
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Right to Information, Public Participation, Appointment of Commissioners, Conservatory Orders, Rule of Law
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr. Kimpei Munei & 59 Others (suing on their own behalf and on behalf of the Maa community and other minority and marginalised groups in Kenya and in the general public interest)
Applicant
The National Land Commission Selection Panel
Respondent
The Hon. Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioners are entitled to conservatory orders restraining the appointment and functioning of the National Land Commission pending determination of the petition.
- 2 Whether the respondents have complied with their constitutional and statutory obligations to provide information and respond to the petitioners' application.
- 3 Whether the disbandment of the Selection Panel affects the respondents' duty to respond to the court and the petitioners.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents failed to comply with its orders to file a replying affidavit and provide information necessary for the petitioners to consider their options. The court emphasized the constitutional right of every citizen to challenge actions under the law and the duty of State institutions to support the rule of law and justice. The respondents' explanation for non-compliance was deemed inadequate, particularly in light of the petitioners' right to information under Article 35 of the Constitution. To prevent the possibility of the petition being rendered moot by the appointment of the National Land Commission, the court issued conservatory orders restraining the...
Court Disposition
Conservatory orders granted; respondents directed to file and serve replying affidavit by specified date.
Orders
- The respondents shall file and serve a Replying Affidavit on or before 3rd August 2012 when this matter shall be mentioned for directions.
- A conservatory order is issued restraining the appointment of the Chairperson and members of the National Land Commission from taking office, carrying on with duties if they have been appointed or in any manner dealing or conducting the business of the National Land Commission until 2nd August 2012 or until further...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
Petition 266 of 2012
DR. KIMPEI MUNEI & 59 OTHERS
(SUING ON THEIR OWN BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF
THE MAA COMMUNITY AND OTHER MINORITY AND
MARGINALISED GROUPS IN KENYA
AND IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC INTEREST).............................................PETITIONERS
AND
THE NATIONAL LAND
COMMISSION SELECTION PANEL.....................................................1ST RESPONDENT
THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL .......................................................2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The petitioners in this matter have sought conservatory orders to restrain the National Land Commission Selection Panel from forwarding or submitting any names to the president of the Republic of Kenya for appointment to the position of Chairperson and Members of the National Land Commission.
2. The application for conservatory orders dated 20th June 2012 came up on 22nd June 2012 ex-parte when the applicants were directed to effect service. It thereafter came up for inter-partes hearing on 27th June 2012 but despite service there was no attendance on the respondents’ part. The matter was adjourned for mention on 4th July 2012.
3. On 4th July 2012, there was no appearance or representation on the respondents’ part. At that attendance, Hon. Lady Justice Ngugi disqualified herself and directed that the matter be mentioned before me on 11th July 2012. On that date I was not sitting hence the matter was fixed for hearing on 19th July 2012. On 19th July 2012, I directed the respondent to file and serve the replying affidavit on or before 30th July 2012 and fixed the matter for directions on 31st July 2012 for directions.
4. Today despite my orders the respondents have not filed the Replying Affidavit as directed. Ms Makori, counsel for the respondent informs the court that the documents necessary to file the reply are not available as the Panel for Selection constituted under the National Land Commission Act, 2012 (Act No. 5 of 2012) has been disbanded. She states that she has contacted the public service commission to no avail.
5. Mr Saitabao draw the court’s attention to the provisions of paragraph 15 of the 1st Schedule to the National Land Commission Act, 2012 which states that, “The selection panel shall stand dissolved upon appointment of the Chairperson and members of the Commission under paragraph (8).” Paragraph 16 goes on to state that, “Where the provisions of paragraph 10 apply, the selection panel shall continue to exist but shall stand dissolve upon the requisite appointments being made.” According to Mr Saibatao, it is not clear whether there have been appointments and if so the information should be availed through the replying affidavit to enable the petitioner consider its options.
6. I take a very dim view of the manner in which the respondents have conducted themselves in this matter. The Constitution of Kenya gives every citizen a right to challenge any action exercised by any person pursuant to the Constitution and the law. The petitioner’s have elected to utilise this right which is part of the cherished value of the rule of law articulated in Article 10. The High Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate on this mattes that are brought to it without delay to ensure that the machinery of justice works.
7. The appointment of Commissioners of the National Land Commission under the Act is time limited and it is perhaps the intention of the respondents to run the clock on the petitioners so that they are met with a fait accompli.
8. This court cannot countenance such a situation. The replying affidavit would enable the petitioners decide whether it wants to answer or proceed with the action. It is also not lost to this court that the petitioners have a right to information from the State under Article 35. The reason advanced by the respondents fall far short of the responsibilities placed on State institutions to support the rule of law and justice.
9. In order to ensure that the course of justice is brought on track, I now direct as follows;
(1)The respondents shall file and serve a Replying Affidavit on or before 3rd August 2012 when this matter shall be mentioned for directions.
(2)In the meantime, a conservatory order is issued restraining the appointment of the Chairperson and members of the National land Commission from taking office, carrying on with duties if they have been appointed or in any manner dealing or conducting the business of the National Land Commission until 2nd August 2012 or until further orders of the Court.
DATEDand DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 31st day of July 2012
D.S. MAJANJA
JUDGE
Mr Saitabao instructed by Kanchory and Company Advocates for the petitioner.
Ms Makori , Litigation Counsel, instructed by the State Law Office for the respondent.