[2012] KEHC 5729 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 5729 (KLR)

The court found that the respondents failed to comply with its orders to file a replying affidavit and provide information necessary for the petitioners to consider their options. The court emphasized the constitutional right of every citizen to challenge actions under the law and the duty of State institutions to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 5729 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dr. Kimpei Munei & 59 Others (suing on their own behalf and on behalf of the Maa community and other minority and marginalised groups in Kenya and in the general public interest); Respondent: The National Land Commission Selection Panel; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 266 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders
Outcome
Conservatory orders granted; respondents directed to file and serve replying affidavit by specified date.
Judges
DAS Majanja
Legal Topics
Right to Information, Public Participation, Appointment of Commissioners, Conservatory Orders, Rule of Law
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Land and Property Right to Information Public Participation Appointment of Commissioners Conservatory Orders Rule of Law

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr. Kimpei Munei & 59 Others (suing on their own behalf and on behalf of the Maa community and other minority and marginalised groups in Kenya and in the general public interest)

Applicant

The National Land Commission Selection Panel

Respondent

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders

  1. 1 Whether the petitioners are entitled to conservatory orders restraining the appointment and functioning of the National Land Commission pending determination of the petition.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents have complied with their constitutional and statutory obligations to provide information and respond to the petitioners' application.
  3. 3 Whether the disbandment of the Selection Panel affects the respondents' duty to respond to the court and the petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondents failed to comply with its orders to file a replying affidavit and provide information necessary for the petitioners to consider their options. The court emphasized the constitutional right of every citizen to challenge actions under the law and the duty of State institutions to support the rule of law and justice. The respondents' explanation for non-compliance was deemed inadequate, particularly in light of the petitioners' right to information under Article 35 of the Constitution. To prevent the possibility of the petition being rendered moot by the appointment of the National Land Commission, the court issued conservatory orders restraining the...

Court Disposition

Conservatory orders granted; respondents directed to file and serve replying affidavit by specified date.

Orders

  • The respondents shall file and serve a Replying Affidavit on or before 3rd August 2012 when this matter shall be mentioned for directions.
  • A conservatory order is issued restraining the appointment of the Chairperson and members of the National Land Commission from taking office, carrying on with duties if they have been appointed or in any manner dealing or conducting the business of the National Land Commission until 2nd August 2012 or until further...