[2016] KEELC 289 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 289 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs are the registered proprietors of the suit properties, as evidenced by their title deeds, and there was no material before the court to contest their ownership. The National Land Commission's threat to demolish the properties, based on a public notice, was not supported by any...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELC 289 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Dr. Szumbah Mwanaongoro & 8 Others; Defendant: National Land Commission; Defendant: Hon. Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 165 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome
Application for interlocutory injunction allowed.
Judges
MA Silau
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Registered Land Titles, Demolition Orders, Public Land Reservations
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctive Relief Registered Land Titles Demolition Orders Public Land Reservations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr. Szumbah Mwanaongoro & 8 Others

Plaintiff

National Land Commission

Defendant

Hon. Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs have established a prima facie case for grant of an interlocutory injunction against demolition of their properties.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to protection as registered proprietors of the suit properties pending determination of the main suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs are the registered proprietors of the suit properties, as evidenced by their title deeds, and there was no material before the court to contest their ownership. The National Land Commission's threat to demolish the properties, based on a public notice, was not supported by any response or evidence from the defendants. The plaintiffs demonstrated a prima facie case and stood to suffer irreparable harm if the demolitions proceeded. Accordingly, the court granted the interlocutory injunction restraining the defendants from demolishing or interfering with the suit properties pending the hearing and determination of the main suit.

Court Disposition

Application for interlocutory injunction allowed.

Orders

  • Respondents are restrained from demolishing or interfering with the suit properties in any way until the suit is heard and determined.
  • Plaintiffs are awarded the costs of the application.