[2013] KEHAT 3 (KLR)

[2013] KEHAT 3 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that while the Claimant's dismissal was arbitrary and unlawful, it lacked jurisdiction to determine the employment termination issue, as such matters fall within the purview of the Industrial Court. However, the Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to determine the claim of discrimination based...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHAT 3 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: DS; Respondent: Association of People With Aids in Kenya (TAPWAK)
Court
HIV and AIDS Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 2 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim for discrimination upheld; damages and costs awarded. Claim for unlawful termination not determined for lack of jurisdiction.
Judges
JO Arwa, A Siparo, MN Kullow, J Kyambi, S Bosire, J Muriuki
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Workplace Discrimination, Jurisdiction of Tribunal
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Unlawful Termination Workplace Discrimination Jurisdiction of Tribunal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

DS

Applicant

Association of People With Aids in Kenya (TAPWAK)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the Claimant was arbitrary, unlawful and an infringement of her rights under labour laws.
  2. 2 Whether the HIV Tribunal had jurisdiction to adjudicate on labour law issues.
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant was entitled to damages on grounds of discrimination by the Respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that while the Claimant's dismissal was arbitrary and unlawful, it lacked jurisdiction to determine the employment termination issue, as such matters fall within the purview of the Industrial Court. However, the Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to determine the claim of discrimination based on HIV status. The Claimant proved, on a balance of probability, that she was discriminated against by the Respondent, who withdrew her benefits and ultimately terminated her employment due to her HIV status. The Respondent's failure to participate in the proceedings further supported the Claimant's case. The Tribunal awarded the Claimant Kshs. 250,000 as damages for...

Court Disposition

Claim for discrimination upheld; damages and costs awarded. Claim for unlawful termination not determined for lack of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The Respondent is liable for discrimination against the Claimant.
  • The Claimant is awarded Kshs. 250,000 as damages for discrimination.