[2015] KEHC 72 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 72 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was entitled to bail as a constitutional right under Article 49(1)(h) and that there were no compelling reasons presented to deny bail. The court also determined that the proceedings of 15th July 2015 in the lower court were a nullity because they proceeded in the applicant's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 72 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Duke Makori Orina Alias Captain; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 8 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Bail, Declaration of Nullity, Revision, and Transfer
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
CB Nagillah
Legal Topics
Bail and Bond, Revision of Criminal Proceedings, Transfer of Criminal Cases
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Bail and Bond Revision of Criminal Proceedings Transfer of Criminal Cases

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Duke Makori Orina Alias Captain

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Bail, Declaration of Nullity, Revision, and Transfer

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending trial.
  2. 2 Whether the proceedings of 15th July 2015 were a nullity due to the applicant's absence.
  3. 3 Whether the court should call for and revise the lower court's proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was entitled to bail as a constitutional right under Article 49(1)(h) and that there were no compelling reasons presented to deny bail. The court also determined that the proceedings of 15th July 2015 in the lower court were a nullity because they proceeded in the applicant's absence, which was justified by medical evidence. The court exercised its revisionary jurisdiction to declare those proceedings a nullity and ordered the transfer of the criminal case to Nyamira Law Courts for a hearing de novo. The respondent did not oppose the application, and the court emphasized the constitutional presumption of innocence and the paramountcy of the right to...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant is admitted to a personal bond of Kshs. 50,000 pending hearing of his case, with surety to be approved by the Deputy Registrar.
  • The applicant is to report to court for mention of his case monthly until hearing and determination or further orders.