[2022] KEELRC 771 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 771 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was entitled to a certificate under Section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act to facilitate execution of the judgment delivered in his favour. The statutory requirements for issuance of such a certificate had been met, as the requisite period had lapsed and the costs had been...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 771 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Duncan Mugane; Respondent: County Government of Embu
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 480 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Post Judgment Execution Application
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DKN Marete
Legal Topics
Government Proceedings, Execution of Decree, Certificate Under Section 21, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Government Proceedings Execution of Decree Certificate Under Section 21 Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Duncan Mugane

Applicant

County Government of Embu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Post Judgment Execution Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a certificate under Section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act for execution of judgment against the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether costs of the application should be awarded to the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was entitled to a certificate under Section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act to facilitate execution of the judgment delivered in his favour. The statutory requirements for issuance of such a certificate had been met, as the requisite period had lapsed and the costs had been assessed. The court further held that the application was permissible and that the respondent should bear the costs of the application, as there was no opposition or justification to the contrary. The orders sought were therefore granted as prayed, including assessment of costs at Kshs.12,000.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The decree holder is authorised to execute his judgment against the respondent.
  • The costs of this application shall be borne by the respondent.