[2019] KEHC 824 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 824 (KLR)

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the court's directions issued on 11th July 2019, specifically the requirement to file and serve the record of appeal within 30 days. Despite being served with notice, the appellant took no steps to prosecute the appeal or appear in court. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 824 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Duncan Mwakiriti Mbole; Respondent: Collins Onyango
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 8 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Compliance With Directions; Dismissal for Non Prosecution
Outcome
appeal dismissed for non-compliance and non-prosecution
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Appeal Dismissal, Non Compliance With Court Orders, Burial Dispute
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Dismissal Non Compliance With Court Orders Burial Dispute

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Duncan Mwakiriti Mbole

Appellant

Collins Onyango

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Compliance With Directions; Dismissal for Non Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the appellant complied with the court's directions to file and serve the record of appeal within the stipulated period.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for non-compliance and non-prosecution.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the court's directions issued on 11th July 2019, specifically the requirement to file and serve the record of appeal within 30 days. Despite being served with notice, the appellant took no steps to prosecute the appeal or appear in court. The court found that there was no justification for the delay or non-compliance, and that the appellant had also failed to prosecute an earlier application for conservatory orders, which had already been dismissed for non-attendance. The cumulative effect of these failures justified dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution and non-compliance with court orders.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed for non-compliance and non-prosecution

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed for non-compliance with the orders and directions of 11th July 2019.
  • No orders as to costs.