[2009] KEHC 2125 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 2125 (KLR)

The court found that the issues raised by the plaintiff in defence to the counterclaim—including the period of tenancy, mesne profits, and costs of repair and renovation—are substantive and bona fide disputes. These issues are not suitable for summary determination based on affidavit evidence alone. The court held...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 2125 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Dynamic Institute of Management & Accountancy (DIMA) Ltd; Defendant: Apollo Insurance Co. Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 1271 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Summary Judgment
Outcome
application for summary judgment dismissed
Judges
A Ali-Aroni
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Tenancy Disputes, Rent Arrears, Mesne Profits, Repairs and Renovations
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Summary Judgment Tenancy Disputes Rent Arrears Mesne Profits Repairs and Renovations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dynamic Institute of Management & Accountancy (DIMA) Ltd

Plaintiff

Apollo Insurance Co. Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Summary Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant/applicant is entitled to summary judgment for Kshs.23,736,717.50 as claimed in the counterclaim.
  2. 2 Whether there exist triable issues that warrant a full hearing rather than summary determination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issues raised by the plaintiff in defence to the counterclaim—including the period of tenancy, mesne profits, and costs of repair and renovation—are substantive and bona fide disputes. These issues are not suitable for summary determination based on affidavit evidence alone. The court held that the existence of such triable issues necessitates a full hearing, and therefore, summary judgment is not appropriate in this case. The application for summary judgment was dismissed with costs to the plaintiff/respondent.

Court Disposition

application for summary judgment dismissed

Orders

  • The application for summary judgment is dismissed with costs.