[2013] KEHC 796 (KLR)
The court found that the Petitioner had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the Respondent had committed acts of cruelty and adultery, including violence, threats, and extramarital affairs, some of which involved close relatives of the Petitioner. The evidence established that the parties had been separated for over three years and that the marriage had irretrievably broken down. The Respondent's failure to contest the petition further supported the Petitioner's case. Consequently, the court held that the grounds for dissolution of marriage had been met and granted the divorce, awarding custody of the child to the Petitioner.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 796 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: E A M; Respondent: J B MaliasD M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2013
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 156 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition for divorce granted; marriage dissolved; custody of child awarded to Petitioner; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Custody of Children, Matrimonial Offences, Adultery, Cruelty, Irretrievable Breakdown
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E A M
Applicant
J B MaliasD M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the Petitioner and the Respondent has irretrievably broken down.
- 2 Whether the Respondent committed acts of cruelty and adultery against the Petitioner.
- 3 Whether the Petitioner is entitled to custody of the child of the marriage.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Petitioner had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the Respondent had committed acts of cruelty and adultery, including violence, threats, and extramarital affairs, some of which involved close relatives of the Petitioner. The evidence established that the parties had been separated for over three years and that the marriage had irretrievably broken down. The Respondent's failure to contest the petition further supported the Petitioner's case. Consequently, the court held that the grounds for dissolution of marriage had been met and granted the divorce, awarding custody of the child to the Petitioner.
Court Disposition
Petition for divorce granted; marriage dissolved; custody of child awarded to Petitioner; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The marriage solemnized at the District Commissioner’s Office, Kuria District on 17th March 2008 between the Petitioner and the Respondent is dissolved.
- Decree nisi dissolving the said marriage is issued, to be made absolute three months from the date of judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment