https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/5009

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/5009

The petition was transferred because none of the respondents had a principal office in Meru, all were based in Nairobi, an existing Milimani petition sought similar reliefs, and hearing the matter in Meru created a real risk of conflicting orders and unnecessary public expense.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELC 5009 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: East Africa Wildlife Society; 1st Respondent: Attorney General; 2nd Respondent: The National Assembly; 3rd Respondent: The Senate; 4th Respondent: The Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Climate Change & Forestry; 5th Respondent: Kenya Forest Service; 6th Respondent: The National Land Commission
Court
Environment and Land Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Planning Petition E003 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition Challenging Amendments to the Forest Conservation and Management Act / Ruling on Forum and Transfer of Petition
Outcome
Petition transferred to Milimani Environment and Land Court.
Judges
["BM Eboso"]
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction and Venue, Transfer of Proceedings, Multiplicity of Suits, Risk of Conflicting Orders, Public Interest Litigation, Challenge to Statutory Amendments
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Environment and Land Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction and Venue Transfer of Proceedings Multiplicity of Suits Risk of Conflicting Orders Public Interest Litigation +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

East Africa Wildlife Society

Petitioner

Attorney General

1st Respondent

The National Assembly

2nd Respondent

The Senate

3rd Respondent

The Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Climate Change & Forestry

4th Respondent

Kenya Forest Service

5th Respondent

The National Land Commission

6th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition Challenging Amendments to the Forest Conservation and Management Act / Ruling on Forum and Transfer of Petition

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner had justified filing the petition in Meru rather than Nairobi
  2. 2 Whether the petition should be transferred to Milimani Environment and Land Court
  3. 3 Whether parallel proceedings risk conflicting judicial orders

Ratio Decidendi

The petition was transferred because none of the respondents had a principal office in Meru, all were based in Nairobi, an existing Milimani petition sought similar reliefs, and hearing the matter in Meru created a real risk of conflicting orders and unnecessary public expense.

Court Disposition

Petition transferred to Milimani Environment and Land Court.

Orders

  • The petition is transferred to the Environment and Physical Planning Division of the Environment and Land Court at Milimani for disposal alongside Milimani ELCEP Petition No. E033 of 2026.
  • The matter shall be mentioned before the Environment and Land Court Deputy Registrar at Milimani on 10/8/2026.