[2008] KEHC 858 (KLR)
The court found that its previous order regarding the calculation of interest at court rates was made in error, as neither the court nor counsel was aware of the varied decree dated 5th October 1995. The varied decree expressly provided for interest at 2% above the prevailing commercial rates, not at court rates....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 858 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: East African Engineering Consultants; Respondent: Municipal Council of Kisumu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case 748 of 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Court Orders Regarding Calculation of Interest on Decretal Sum
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; previous order on interest calculation varied to align with the varied decree; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Review of Court Orders, Interest Calculation, Decree Variation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
East African Engineering Consultants
Applicant
Municipal Council of Kisumu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Court Orders Regarding Calculation of Interest on Decretal Sum
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court's previous order on interest calculation was erroneous in light of a varied decree.
- 2 What is the correct rate and method for calculating interest on the decretal sum after the variation of the original judgment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that its previous order regarding the calculation of interest at court rates was made in error, as neither the court nor counsel was aware of the varied decree dated 5th October 1995. The varied decree expressly provided for interest at 2% above the prevailing commercial rates, not at court rates. The court therefore held that the interest on the decretal sum must be calculated in accordance with the varied decree. The order of 21st May 2008 was varied to reflect this, with all other aspects of the order remaining unchanged. The court emphasized that the interest should be simple, not compound, and calculated without rests except for payments made by the judgment-debtor.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; previous order on interest calculation varied to align with the varied decree; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The order of 21st May 2008 regarding interest calculation is varied to require interest at 2% above prevailing commercial rates as per the varied decree of 5th October 1995.
- All other aspects of the orders of 21st May 2008 remain unchanged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Miscellaneous Case 748 of 1996
EAST AFRICAN ENGINEERINGCONSULTANTS …..DECREE-HOLDER
V E R S U S
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OFKISUMU ……….....…….JUDGMENT-DEBTOR
R U L I N G
Mr. Ogembo, learned counsel for the Judgment-Debtor herein, has now become aware of the fact that the judgment delivered in favour of Decree-Holder in the primary suit (Nairobi HCCC No. 1676 of 1987) was on 5th October, 1995 varied by consent. The original judgment awarded the Decree-Holder the sum of KShs. 1,126,000/00 plus costs and interest at court rates. The variation was to the effect that the Decree-Holder was awarded KShs. 8,112,673/00 plus costs and interest at the rate of 2% above the prevailing commercial rates. Mr. Ogembo therefore, quite properly in my view, conceded the Decree-Holder’s application by notice of motion dated 11th July, 2008.
In that application the Decree-Holder sought an appropriate review of the orders of the court (Waweru,J) of 21st May 2008. The court had ordered, inter alia, that the Deputy Registrar do forthwith take accounts in order to determine the outstanding decretal sum. The court had further ordered that in so doing
2 “….the interest upon the decretal sum shall be simple and not compound. In other words, the interest shall be calculated at court rates from the date of the suit without rests except those necessitated by any payments made by the Judgment-Debtor towards the decretal sum ……”
When I made this order, I, just as Mr. Ogembo, was not aware of the varied decree. The directions relating to interest were therefore given in error. I will therefore vary that part of the order to the effect that in taking accounts in order to determine the outstanding decretal sum the interest shall be calculated at the rate that was awarded in the variation of 5th October, 1995. All the other aspects of the orders of 21st May, 2008 shall remain the same. For the avoidance of doubt, the interest shall be simple and not compound. That is, the interest shall be calculated without rests except those necessitated by any payments made by the Judgment-Debtor towards the decretal sum.
The notice of motion dated 11th July, 2008 is therefore allowed only to the above extent. There will be no order as to costs of this application. It is so ordered.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2008
H. P. G. WAWERU
J U D G E
DELIVERED THIS 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2008