[2005] KEHC 465 (KLR)
The court held that the application to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution was premature because no directions had been taken in the appeal as required by Order XLI rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The rule only applies after directions have been given, and since both parties conceded that directions had...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 465 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: E.A.T.E.C. Limited; Appellant: Peter Emachuku; Respondent: Festo Ahanza Angosi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 147 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Application struck out as premature; costs awarded to appellants.
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Directions Under Rule 8b, Appeal Procedure, Preliminary Objection
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E.A.T.E.C. Limited
Appellant
Peter Emachuku
Appellant
Festo Ahanza Angosi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Order XLI rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
- 2 Whether the application for dismissal is premature where directions have not been taken.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the application to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution was premature because no directions had been taken in the appeal as required by Order XLI rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The rule only applies after directions have been given, and since both parties conceded that directions had not been taken, the application could not be entertained at this stage. The court therefore struck out the application with costs and directed the Deputy Registrar to ensure the appeal is listed for directions within 30 days.
Court Disposition
Application struck out as premature; costs awarded to appellants.
Orders
- The application to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution is struck out with costs.
- The Deputy Registrar shall ensure the appeal is listed for directions within 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT ELDORET
Civil Case 147 of 2001
E.A.T.E.C. LIMITED ANDPETER EMACHUKU ……………….APPELLANTS
V E R S U S
FESTO AHANZA ANGOSI……..……….........………….…….. RESPONDENT
RULING
Order XLI rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules, stipulates that:-
“Unless within three months after the giving of directions under rule 8B the appeal shall have been set down for hearing by the appellant, the respondent shall be at liberty either to set down the appeal for hearing or to apply by summons for its dismissal for want of prosecution”.
Mr. Miyienda, learned counsel for the respondent who relies on the above provision of the rules of civil procedure amongst others, has moved this court in an application in which he prays that the appeal filed herein be dismissed for want of prosecution.
It is his contention that though the appeal herein was filed in 2001, the appellants have not taken the appropriate action to have the appeal heard and determined, which act of omission is to the detriment of his client, who has in the process been denied the enjoyment of the fruits of his judgment.
Mr. Kuloba has however raised a preliminary objection to the application, which he claims is premature, as directions have yet to be taken. He urged the court to strike it out with costs.
I have taken the submissions of both counsel into account and in my mind, it cannot be gainsaid that the provisions of the aforementioned rule can only apply where directions have been obtained. Yet it is clear in this appeal, a fact which Mr. Miyienda concedes to, that no directions have been taken in this appeal, which means that the application is premature and for which reason it is struck out with costs.
I do however order that the Deputy Registrar ensures that this appeal is listed for directions in line with rule 8B aforementioned, within the next 30 days.
Dated and delivered at Eldoret this 19th day of April 2005.
JEANNE GACHECHE
Judge
Delivered in the presence of:
Mr. Kuloba for the respondent /Appellant
Mr. Ruto holding brief for Mr. Miyieda for the applicant/respondent.