[2018] KEELRC 2230 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2230 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant had already been paid service gratuity for the period 1987 to 1999, as evidenced by documentary proof and corroborated by the respondent's witness. For the period 2012 to 2015, the claimant was a member of the respondent's pension scheme and failed to provide any contractual or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2230 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Ebrahim Muthee Murogo; Respondent: Ultimate Security Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 149 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Terminal Benefits, Service Gratuity, Pension Entitlements, Overtime Claims
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Terminal Benefits Service Gratuity Pension Entitlements Overtime Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ebrahim Muthee Murogo

Claimant

Ultimate Security Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was entitled to service gratuity for the period 1987 to 1999.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was entitled to terminal benefits for the period 2012 to 2015.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was entitled to overtime pay for 12 days allegedly worked during off days.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant had already been paid service gratuity for the period 1987 to 1999, as evidenced by documentary proof and corroborated by the respondent's witness. For the period 2012 to 2015, the claimant was a member of the respondent's pension scheme and failed to provide any contractual or legal basis for further terminal benefits. The overtime claim was dismissed due to lack of particulars and evidential support. The claimant's assertions were found to be general and unsupported by evidence. Consequently, the court held that none of the claimant's heads of claim had merit or were proved, and dismissed the claim in its entirety.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

Orders

  • The Memorandum of Claim filed on 30 January 2017 is dismissed with no order as to costs.