[2020] KECA 724 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 724 (KLR)

The Court found that the applicant had demonstrated that the 2nd respondent did not participate in the High Court proceedings and could not be traced for service. The applicant complied with the procedural requirement to file the application for waiver of service within seven days of lodging the Notice of Appeal,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KECA 724 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ecobank Kenya Limited; Respondent: Samuel Mburu Waweru & Stephen Koigi Waweru (Administrators of the Estate of the Late Peter Waweru Mungura); Respondent: Dominic Kimani Kamau; Respondent: Uncle Sams Giturai Limited; Respondent: Samuel Mureithi Murioki; Respondent: Beatrice Kosgei
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 267 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Leave to Waive Service of Notice of Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
AK Murgor
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Waiver of Service, Appellate Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Service of Process Waiver of Service Appellate Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ecobank Kenya Limited

Applicant

Samuel Mburu Waweru & Stephen Koigi Waweru (Administrators of the Estate of the Late Peter Waweru Mungura)

Respondent

Dominic Kimani Kamau

Respondent

Uncle Sams Giturai Limited

Respondent

Samuel Mureithi Murioki

Respondent

Beatrice Kosgei

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Leave to Waive Service of Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Court should dispense with service of the Notice of Appeal on the 2nd respondent who did not participate in the High Court proceedings and whose whereabouts are unknown.
  2. 2 Whether the application for waiver of service was filed within the prescribed time under the Court of Appeal Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicant had demonstrated that the 2nd respondent did not participate in the High Court proceedings and could not be traced for service. The applicant complied with the procedural requirement to file the application for waiver of service within seven days of lodging the Notice of Appeal, properly excluding the national holiday from the computation of time. Consequently, the Court exercised its discretion to dispense with the requirement of service of the Notice of Appeal on the 2nd respondent.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Service of the Notice of Appeal on the 2nd respondent, Dominic Kimani Kamau, is dispensed with.
  • No order as to costs.