[2020] KEHC 650 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 650 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had properly taxed his advocate-client bill of costs and obtained a certificate of taxation for Kshs 11,291,465.70. The respondent did not dispute the retainer or oppose the application despite being duly served. There was no evidence before the court to warrant refusal of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 650 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Eddy Nicholas O. Orinda t/a One and Associates Advocate; Respondent: Sun Apartments Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 257 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant as prayed
Judges
WA Okwany
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Costs, Judgment Entry, Execution of Decree
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Costs Judgment Entry Execution of Decree

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eddy Nicholas O. Orinda t/a One and Associates Advocate

Applicant

Sun Apartments Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed advocate-client costs as certified.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has raised any valid objection to the application for judgment on taxed costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had properly taxed his advocate-client bill of costs and obtained a certificate of taxation for Kshs 11,291,465.70. The respondent did not dispute the retainer or oppose the application despite being duly served. There was no evidence before the court to warrant refusal of the orders sought. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and entered judgment for the applicant as prayed, including interest and costs of the application and execution.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant as prayed

Orders

  • Judgment and decree entered for the applicant against the respondent for Kshs 11,291,465.70 on account of taxed advocate-client legal costs.
  • Interest and costs of the application and execution awarded to the applicant.