[2021] KEHC 7395 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7395 (KLR)

The court found that the ex parte Applicant's application for leave for judicial review was procedurally defective due to the absence of a supporting statement as mandated by Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. However, rather than striking out the application, the court exercised its discretion to allow...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 7395 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Edin Hassan Ibrahim; Respondent: Attorney General; Respondent: Director National Council of Persons With Disabilities; Respondent: Policy Unit Technical Manager Kenya Revenue Authority
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E057 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Preliminary Application for Leave and Directions
Outcome
Leave granted to file supporting statement; matter set for hearing; directions issued.
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus, Prohibition, Procedural Compliance, Leave to Apply, Civil Procedure Rules
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Mandamus Prohibition Procedural Compliance Leave to Apply Civil Procedure Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edin Hassan Ibrahim

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

Director National Council of Persons With Disabilities

Respondent

Policy Unit Technical Manager Kenya Revenue Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Preliminary Application for Leave and Directions

  1. 1 Whether the ex parte Applicant's application for leave for judicial review orders is competent in the absence of a supporting statement as required by Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the Applicant should be granted leave to file the required statement and have the matter set for hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the ex parte Applicant's application for leave for judicial review was procedurally defective due to the absence of a supporting statement as mandated by Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. However, rather than striking out the application, the court exercised its discretion to allow the Applicant to rectify the defect by granting leave to file the required statement within fourteen days. The court further directed that the matter be set down for hearing and that the relevant parties be notified accordingly. The decision underscores the importance of procedural compliance in judicial review applications while balancing the need to facilitate access to...

Court Disposition

Leave granted to file supporting statement; matter set for hearing; directions issued.

Orders

  • The ex parte Applicant is granted leave to file a statement in support of the Chamber Summons dated 24th April 2021 within fourteen days.
  • The Chamber Summons dated 24th April 2021 shall be heard on 10th May 2021.