[2018] KEHC 8100 (KLR)
The court determined that since the applicant, Edith Gacheri, has already served the term of imprisonment imposed, there is no further legal or procedural issue to be addressed. Accordingly, the file should be closed as the purpose of the revision has been overtaken by events.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 8100 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Edith Gacheri; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 315 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Order
- Outcome
- file closed as sentence served
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Completion, Criminal Revision, Inmate Release
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edith Gacheri
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has already served the term imposed by the court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that since the applicant, Edith Gacheri, has already served the term of imprisonment imposed, there is no further legal or procedural issue to be addressed. Accordingly, the file should be closed as the purpose of the revision has been overtaken by events.
Court Disposition
file closed as sentence served
Orders
- File be closed as the inmate has already served the term.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
11 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
HIGH COURT REVISION NO 315 OF 2017
EDITH GACHERI.....................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC.............................................................RESPONDENT
ORDER
File be closed as the inmate has already served the term.
A. MABEYA
JUDGE
15/01/2018