[2016] KEHC 5783 (KLR)
The court held that the grounds advanced by the applicant, namely the alleged disobedience of a deceased father's wishes and resultant family misfortunes, do not fall within the legally recognized grounds for review of a judgment under Order 45 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The court found no error on the face of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 5783 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Edith Irima Mbandithio; Respondent: James Ngari Njeru
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 84 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Review of Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Review of Judgment, Land Inheritance, Succession Disputes, Error on Face of Record
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edith Irima Mbandithio
Appellant
James Ngari Njeru
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Review of Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established grounds for review of the court's judgment under Order 45 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
- 2 Whether alleged family misfortunes and disobedience of a deceased father's wishes constitute sufficient reason for review.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the grounds advanced by the applicant, namely the alleged disobedience of a deceased father's wishes and resultant family misfortunes, do not fall within the legally recognized grounds for review of a judgment under Order 45 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The court found no error on the face of the record, no discovery of new and important matter, and no sufficient reason as contemplated by the law. Consequently, the application for review was dismissed for lack of merit.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for review is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2010
EDITH IRIMA MBANDITHIO.............................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
JAMES NGARI NJERU.....................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
This is an application for review brought under chamber summons dated 27th August 2015 in respect of the judgement of this court (Ong'udi, J) delivered on 9th September 2014. The appellant/applicant seeks the following orders:
That the respondent James Ngari Njeru be awarded 0. 46 Ha out of parcel of land Nthawa/Gitiburi/2127 registered in the name of the applicant Edith Irima Mbandithio.
That the applicant Edith Irima Mbandithio be awarded parcel of land No. Nthawa/Gitiburi/2128 wholly.
The order sought to be reviewed is in relation to land parcel No. Nthawa/Gitiburi/2128 which had shared that land parcel between the applicant to inherit 1. 35 Ha and the respondent to inherit 0. 46 Ha. The application is supported by a supporting affidavit. According to the applicant, land parcel No. Nthawa/Gitiburi/2128 was given to her by her late father Njeru Itumbi during his lifetime. She further states that she occupied that parcel of land in 1975 together with her children up to date.
Furthermore, she has stated that her late father warned the respondent against forcefully taking away the above named parcel number from her. It is also her affidavit evidence that the father warned him against filing any court proceedings against the applicant. This notwithstanding, the respondent has disobeyed their father's directive and has forcefully attempted to take away the said land from her. He also went further to file succession proceedings in respect of their father's estate without her knowledge and that she only came to know about it from a good Samaritan.
In her affidavit also the applicant has stated that as a result of this dispute the respondent, herself and family members have experienced several misfortunes which she asserts are as a result of disobeying their father's wishes. In order to avoid further misfortunes, she has requested this court to vary its judgement which was delivered on 9th September 2014. She also says that she is ready and willing to transfer a portion measuring 0. 46 Ha to the respondent out of her parcel No Nthawa/Gitiburi/2127 in place of the portion awarded to the respondent out of parcel No. Nthawa/Gitiburi/2128.
Finally she states that the court should order registration of Nthawa/Gitiburi/2128 in her name wholly as per her deceased father's wishes.
During the hearing of the application in court, the applicant repeated the contents of her affidavit which I have set out above. The respondent opposed her application in his submissions in court.
This is an application for review of this court's order dated 9th September 2014. In terms of Order 45 of the 2010 CPR a party may apply for review of a court judgement if the following conditions are shown to exist:
If there is an error or mistake on the face of the record, or
Or there is a discovery of a new and important matter which after exercising due diligence after trial was not available but that new matter came to his knowledge after the judgement had been delivered, or
for any other sufficient reason.
The reason why review is sought is that the respondent allegedly went against the wishes or directives of his father. As a result a curse has befallen their family because the respondent allegedly went against the directives of his father. In order to avoid further misfortunes, the review is sought to avoid them.
It is clear from the foregoing that the grounds upon which review of a court judgement is entertained do not include beliefs in curses allegedly arising from one of the parties going against the wishes of a deceased father. In the circumstances, the application is not merited and is hereby dismissed.
RULING DATED, SIGNEDand DELIVERED in open court at EMBU this18th day of FEBRUARY 2016
In the absence of both applicant and respondent
Court clerk Njue
J.M. BWONWONGA
JUDGE
18. 02. 16