[2022] KEHC 82 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 82 (KLR)

The court found that the Certificate of Taxation for Kshs. 145,450 had not been set aside, altered, or appealed against, and the Respondent did not dispute the retainer or oppose the application. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act empowers the court to enter judgment on such a certificate. However, the Applicant...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 82 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Edward Gacau Kariuki t/a Gacau Kariuki & Co. Advocates; Respondent: Daniel Maina Mwangi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E573 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Certificate of Taxation as Judgment and for Interest
Outcome
application partially allowed
Judges
A Mshila
Legal Topics
Advocate Client Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Interest on Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Advocate Client Costs Certificate of Taxation Interest on Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward Gacau Kariuki t/a Gacau Kariuki & Co. Advocates

Applicant

Daniel Maina Mwangi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Certificate of Taxation as Judgment and for Interest

  1. 1 Whether judgment and decree should be entered on the Certificate of Taxation dated 1st October 2021.
  2. 2 Whether the Applicant should be awarded interest accrued on the costs at 14% per annum from 11th September 2021.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Certificate of Taxation for Kshs. 145,450 had not been set aside, altered, or appealed against, and the Respondent did not dispute the retainer or oppose the application. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act empowers the court to enter judgment on such a certificate. However, the Applicant failed to provide evidence that the claim for interest at 14% per annum was raised with the client at the time of delivering the bill, as required by Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order. Consequently, judgment was entered for the taxed amount, but the claim for interest was disallowed.

Court Disposition

application partially allowed

Orders

  • The Taxation Order for the sum of Kshs. 145,450 is adopted as a judgment of the court.
  • The claim for interest at the rate of 14% from 11th September 2021 is disallowed.