[2021] KEELRC 673 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 673 (KLR)

The court determined that, although the claimants have had access to the 4th respondent's report since March 2020, denying them the opportunity to file additional affidavits could be perceived as denying them a fair hearing. To uphold the principles of justice and fairness, the court granted the claimants seven days...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 673 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Edward Githinji & 131 Others; Respondent: Kenya Medical Research Institute; Respondent: The Director, Kenya Medical Research Institute; Respondent: The Board of Management, Kenya Medical Research Institute; Respondent: Salaries Remuneration Commission; Respondent: Ministry of Health; Respondent: The Cabinet Secretary, National Treasury; Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1545 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Interlocutory Ruling
Outcome
adjourned with directions for further affidavits and mention for fixing hearing date
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Affidavit Filing, Examination of Reports, Right to Be Heard
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Affidavit Filing Examination of Reports Right to Be Heard

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward Githinji & 131 Others

Applicant

Kenya Medical Research Institute

Respondent

The Director, Kenya Medical Research Institute

Respondent

The Board of Management, Kenya Medical Research Institute

Respondent

Salaries Remuneration Commission

Respondent

Ministry of Health

Respondent

The Cabinet Secretary, National Treasury

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Interlocutory Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the claimants should be allowed additional time to file and serve further affidavits regarding the 4th respondent's report.
  2. 2 Whether proceeding without allowing further affidavits would amount to shutting out a party from justice.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, although the claimants have had access to the 4th respondent's report since March 2020, denying them the opportunity to file additional affidavits could be perceived as denying them a fair hearing. To uphold the principles of justice and fairness, the court granted the claimants seven days to file and serve any further affidavits they may have. The court also noted that examination and cross-examination of the report is pending, as the 4th respondent has not yet mounted its defence. The matter was adjourned for mention and fixing of a hearing date, with the expectation that the case will be concluded expeditiously given its age.

Court Disposition

adjourned with directions for further affidavits and mention for fixing hearing date

Orders

  • The claimants have 7 days to file and serve any additional affidavit they may have.
  • The matter will be mentioned on 13th October 2021 for fixing of a hearing date.