[2004] KEHC 756 (KLR)
The High Court found that the sentence of two years imprisonment for a first offender who pleaded guilty to assault causing actual bodily harm was harsh and excessive, particularly in the absence of evidence detailing the extent of the complainant's injuries. The trial magistrate failed to provide reasons for not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 756 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Edward Kichana Gentoto; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 207 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, Plea of Guilty, First Offender, Non Custodial Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edward Kichana Gentoto
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of two years imprisonment for assault causing actual bodily harm was harsh and excessive in the circumstances.
- 2 Whether the trial magistrate properly considered the option of a non-custodial sentence for a first offender who pleaded guilty.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that the sentence of two years imprisonment for a first offender who pleaded guilty to assault causing actual bodily harm was harsh and excessive, particularly in the absence of evidence detailing the extent of the complainant's injuries. The trial magistrate failed to provide reasons for not considering a non-custodial sentence and did not properly direct himself in passing sentence. Given that the appellant had already served over three months, the High Court held that this period was sufficient punishment and substituted the sentence to time already served, ordering the appellant's release unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed
Orders
- The sentence of two years imprisonment is set aside and substituted with a sentence of the period already served.
- The appellant is to be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
12 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.207 OF 2004
(From original conviction and sentence of the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Kisii in Criminal Case No.1811 of 2004 – A. A. INGUTYA ESQ., S.R.M)
EDWARD KICHANA GENTOTO ………………………………… APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …………………………………………………………. DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
Appellant was convicted for the offence of assault causing actual bodily harm c/s 251 Penal Code by the Senior Resident Magistrate Kisii. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to two (2) years imprisonment.
The appeal was against both conviction and sentence. However during the hearing the appeal against conviction was abandoned.
The State Counsel conceded to the appeal against sentence.
As I said the appellant pleaded guilty. The facts given by the prosecution were very scanty – just three sentences. Apparently the P3 form was not produced to show the extent of injuries suffered by the complainant. Appellant was a first offender and he pleaded for leniency. The sentence of 2 years imprisonment was, in the circumstances harsh and excessive. The court did not ever say why it felt such a sentence was warranted. The magistrate did not say why he felt that the appellant could not benefit from a non-custodial sentence. He did not properly direct himself to give a proper and just sentence and I will therefore allow the appeal.
Appellant has already served over 3 months of the sentence. I feel that is enough punishment. I therefore substitute the sentence of two years to one of the period already served. Appellant be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Kisii this 29th day of November 2004.
KABURU BAUNI JUDGE