[2019] KEELRC 1488 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant's employment was terminated without notice, reason, or disciplinary hearing, in violation of Sections 41, 43, and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007. The respondent failed to appear or defend the suit, and the claimant's evidence was unchallenged. The court held that the termination was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELRC 1488 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Edward Mera Rao; Respondent: Robinson Investment Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 87 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the claimant
- Judges
- MN Nduma
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Termination, Compensation for Termination, Notice Pay, Procedural Fairness, Employment Contracts
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edward Mera Rao
Claimant
Robinson Investment Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's employment was terminated unlawfully and unfairly.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for wrongful termination and payment in lieu of notice.
- 3 Whether the respondent complied with the procedural requirements under the Employment Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant's employment was terminated without notice, reason, or disciplinary hearing, in violation of Sections 41, 43, and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007. The respondent failed to appear or defend the suit, and the claimant's evidence was unchallenged. The court held that the termination was unlawful and unfair, entitling the claimant to compensation for wrongful termination and payment in lieu of notice. The court awarded the claimant three months' salary as compensation and one month's salary in lieu of notice, totaling Kshs 42,000, with interest and costs.
Court Disposition
judgment for the claimant
Orders
- The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs 42,000 as compensation for wrongful termination and payment in lieu of notice.
- The award shall accrue interest at court rates from the date of judgment until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT KISUMU
CAUSE NO. 87 OF 2017
(Before Hon. Justice Mathews N. Nduma)
EDWARD MERA RAO.......................................................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
ROBINSON INVESTMENT LIMITED.......................................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The suit was filed on 28th February 2017 seeking compensation for unlawful termination of employment, arrear salary from 1st August 2015 and salary in lieu of notice in the sum of Kshs 42,000.
2. The suit was served on the respondent on 10th March 2017 and an affidavit of service filed by Mr. Richard Otieno Okungu, an advocate in conduct of the suit.
3. The respondent did not enter appearance nor file a statement of defence.
4. The suit proceeded to formal proof on 11th July 2018. The claimant testified under oath in support of the case. He relied on a witness statement dated 28th February 2017 as his evidence in chief. The claimant produced the documents annexed to the statement of claim as exhibits in the suit.
5. The undisputed fact of the case are that the claimant was employed by the respondent in 1st September 2014 as a security guard. The claimant earned Kshs. 7,000 per month. On 1st August 2015 the respondent terminated the employment of the claimant verbally.
The claimant was informed that there was no more work to be done. The claimant produced NSSF and NHIF statements paid for him by the respondent. He told the court that he was not given notice of termination, reason for termination and was not subjected to any disciplinary hearing. The claimant testified that the termination was unlawful. That he was only paid Kshs 4,000 upon termination. The claimant sought payment in lieu of notice. The claimant also sought compensation for the wrongful termination of employment.
6. The claimant has proved on a balance of probabilities that his employment was terminated without notice, any reason or disciplinary hearing. The termination of the employment of the claimant was unlawful and unfair and in violation of Sections 41, 43 and 45 of the Employment Act. The claimant is entitled to compensation in terms of Section 49 (1) (c) as read with 49(4) of the Employment Act 2007.
7. The claimant did not contribute to the termination. The claimant had served the respondent for about one year. The claimant was underpaid in terms of the General Wage Order. The claimant was not paid in lieu of notice. The claimant lost his employment unfairly and suffered loss and damage.
8. The court awards the claimant three (3) months salary in compensation for the wrongful termination of employment in the sum of Kshs 35,000.
9. The claimant is also awarded Kshs 7,000 in lieu of one month notice.
10. In the final analysis judgment is entered in favour of claimant as against the respondent for Kshs. 42,000. The award is with interest at court rates from date of judgment till payment in full. The respondent to pay costs of the suit.
Judgment Dated, Signed and delivered this 20th day of May, 2019
Mathews N. Nduma
Judge
Appearances
Mr. Okungu for the claimant.
Chrispo – Court Clerk