[2014] KEHC 6730 (KLR)
The court found that the objector had proved his case on a balance of probabilities. The evidence established that the land to be distributed was four acres, and the share of the late Ngosia Sakwa should be distributed equally between the objector and the petitioner. The court held that the previous grant was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 6730 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Edward Mukhwana Sakwa; Objector: Nelson Sakwa Khayenje; Deceased: Ngosia Sakwa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 245 of 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- objector's claim allowed; equal distribution ordered
- Judges
- SJ Chitembwe
- Legal Topics
- Succession of Estates, Distribution of Land, Grant Revocation, Joint Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edward Mukhwana Sakwa
Petitioner
Nelson Sakwa Khayenje
Objector
Ngosia Sakwa
Deceased
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the confirmed grant should be revoked and the estate redistributed.
- 2 How plot number KAKAMEGA/LUANDETI/597 should be distributed among the surviving sons of the deceased.
- 3 Whether the subdivision and registration of plot N.KABRAS/LUANDETI/2129 was valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the objector had proved his case on a balance of probabilities. The evidence established that the land to be distributed was four acres, and the share of the late Ngosia Sakwa should be distributed equally between the objector and the petitioner. The court held that the previous grant was properly revoked, and any subdivisions or registrations made thereafter, including the creation of plot N.KABRAS/LUANDETI/2129, were invalid. The court ordered equal distribution of the four acres between the two surviving sons, in accordance with the objector’s affidavit and the principles of equitable distribution under the Law of Succession Act. Each party was to bear his own costs.
Court Disposition
objector's claim allowed; equal distribution ordered
Orders
- The share of the late Ngosia Sakwa in plot number KAKAMEGA/LUANDETI/597 shall be distributed equally between the objector and the petitioner.
- Each party shall meet his own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT AT KAKAMEGA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO: 245 OF 1998
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF NABWOBA SAKWA....................................................................................DECEASED
AND
EDWARD MUKHWANA SAKWA........................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
NELSON SAKWA KHAYENJE................................................OBJECTOR
JUDGMENT
The late Nambwoba Sakwa died on 30/6/1973. She was survived by three sons, Edward Sakwa, Ngosia Sakwa and Nelson Sakwa. The deceased was not registered owner of plot number KAKAMEGA/LUANDETI/597. Edward and Ngosia filed the succession cause and were issued with a grant of letters of administration on 5/1/1999. The grant was confirmed on 18/8/1999.
On 13/2/2000, Nelson filed a notice of motion seeking to have the confirmed grant revoked. On 28/4/2010 the grant was revoked by the court and on 29/9/2010 the court appointed the two parties herein to be joint administrators, Ngosia is since deceased.
The dispute revolves around the distribution of plot number 597. The objector, Nelson, testified that his late father gave him 9 acres of land while the petitioner was given 8 acres. The land in dispute belonged to Ngosia who is now deceased. It was registered in their mother’s name Ngosia had no wife or child. He proposed to distribute the land equally.
On his part, the petitioner testified that he filed the succession cause and Ngosia was to take 0. 4 hectares. He produced a search dated 1/2/2000 whereby he was registered as the proprietor for 0. 4. Ha. It is his further evidence that he owns plot number N.KABRAS/LUANDETI/2129measuring 3. 20 Hactares. This plot was created from plot number 597. The petitioner’s proposal is to give the objector ½ acre.
The evidence on record shows that plot 597 was registered in the names of the deceased. It is not clear from the parties’ evidence as to whether the 9 and 8 acres given to both parties are separate from plot number 597. It is also not clear as to the exact land to be distributed. A search dated 22/9/1997 indicates that the land is 4. 8 ha. The objector’s evidence is that he can take two (2) acres while the petitioner gets two (2) acres making a total acreage of four acres.
The grant issued to the respondent and his late brother Ngosia was nullified by the court. The nullification restored the suit land in the names of the parties, deceased mother Nabwoba Sakwa. The effect of that order is that plot number N.KABRAS/LUANDETI/2129 was cancelled as it is a sub-division of plot number 597.
Given the evidence on record, I do find that the objector has proved his case as required. I will go by the objector’s evidence which is in line with his affidavit sworn on 6th April, 2011 to the effect that the land to be distributed is four (4) acres. I do order that the share of the late Ngosia Sakwa be distributed equally between the objector and the petitioner. Each party shall meet his own costs.
Dated, signed and Delivered at Kakamega this 27th day of February 2014.
SAID J. CHITEMBWE
JUDGE