[2018] KEHC 4673 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 4673 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate any sufficient cause for the delay in filing the Notice of Appeal from the date judgment was delivered. Furthermore, the applicant did not frame any question of law for consideration by the Court of Appeal in the intended second appeal. The court was not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 4673 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Edward Okemba Okemba; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 46 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Defilement of a Child, Appeal Out of Time, Conviction Upheld
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Defilement of a Child Appeal Out of Time Conviction Upheld

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward Okemba Okemba

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for delay in filing the Notice of Appeal.
  2. 2 Whether there is a question of law for consideration by the Court of Appeal in the intended second appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate any sufficient cause for the delay in filing the Notice of Appeal from the date judgment was delivered. Furthermore, the applicant did not frame any question of law for consideration by the Court of Appeal in the intended second appeal. The court was not satisfied that the applicant's incarceration constituted sufficient cause for delay, nor was there evidence of poverty or other extenuating circumstances. As a result, the application for extension of time was dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to serve the lawful sentence as previously imposed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • The applicant to serve the lawful sentence.