[2018] KEELC 3553 (KLR)
The court found that the appellants and the 1st respondent were in a landlord-tenant relationship under a lease agreement for a ten-year term commencing 1st June 2014, with rent payable monthly in advance. The appellants' application for a temporary injunction was based on uncontroverted affidavit evidence, as the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELC 3553 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Edward Onyango; Appellant: Brenda Akwacha; Respondent: Mohamed Ali Motha; Respondent: Jewo Auctioneers
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal 69 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for temporary injunction granted with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Landlord Tenant Disputes, Interlocutory Injunctions, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edward Onyango
Appellant
Brenda Akwacha
Appellant
Mohamed Ali Motha
Respondent
Jewo Auctioneers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants have established a reasonable case for the issuance of a temporary injunction pending appeal.
- 2 Who should bear the costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellants and the 1st respondent were in a landlord-tenant relationship under a lease agreement for a ten-year term commencing 1st June 2014, with rent payable monthly in advance. The appellants' application for a temporary injunction was based on uncontroverted affidavit evidence, as the respondents only filed grounds of opposition and did not challenge the factual assertions. The court held that the appellants had established a reasonable case for the issuance of a temporary injunction pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, provided they continued to meet their monthly rent obligations under the lease. The application was therefore granted on...
Court Disposition
Application for temporary injunction granted with conditions.
Orders
- Temporary injunction issued restraining the respondents, their employees, agents, or anyone acting on their behalf from levying distress, attaching, advertising for sale, selling, disposing, alienating, dealing or interfering with the appellants' quiet occupation of the business premises known as Kakwacha location...
- Costs of the application to be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KISUMU
ELC APPEAL CASE NO.69 OF 2010
EDWARD ONYANGO..........................................1ST APPELLANT
BRENDA AKWACHA.........................................2ND APPELLANT
VERSUS
MOHAMED ALI MOTHA...............................1ST RESPONDENT
JEWO AUCTIONEERS...................................2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Edward Onyango and Brenda Akwach, the Appellants, filed the notice of motion dated 16th September 2016, seeking for temporary injunction against Mohamed Ali Motha and Jewo Auctioneers, the Respondents, their employees, workers, agents and or whomsoever jointly and severally, restraining them from levying distress, attaching, advertising, for sale, selling, disposing, alienating, dealing and or interfering whatsoever with the Appellants quiet occupation of their business premises known as Kakwacha location along Odera Street within Kisumu townpending the hearing and determination of this appeal. The application is based on the 12 (twelve) grounds marked (a) to (l) on its face and is supported by the affidavit of Edward Onyango sworn on the 19th September 2016.
2. The application is opposed by the Respondents through the grounds of opposition dated 30th September 2016.
3. That directions on filing and exchanging written submissions were given on the 29th March 2017. The Counsel for the Appellants and Respondents then filed their written submissions dated 1st May 2017 and 20th September 2017 respectively.
4. The following are the issues for the determination by the court;
a) Whether the Appellants have established a reasonable case for temporary injunction order to issue at this stage.
b) Who pays the costs.
5. The court has carefully considered the grounds on the notice ofmotion, the affidavit evidence, grounds of opposition, written submissions filed and come to the following findings;
a) That the Appellants and the 1st Respondent are tenants and Landlord respectively by virtue of the lease/Tenancy Agreement dated 24th May 2014 over premises on land parcel Kisumu/Municipality Block 7/81.
b) That the lease/Tenancy agreement is for a period of ten (10) years from 1st June 2014 and the rent is Ksh.90,000/= payable monthly in advance and not later than the fifth day of the month.
c) That the Appellants appeal as discerned from the memorandum, is over a ruling delivered in Kisumu CMCC No.183 of 2006 (sic) on the 14th September 2016 upon the Respondents preliminary objection on the court’s jurisdiction. That in view of the fact that the matters of fact deponed on by the Appellants are not controverted or challenged by the Respondents, who only filed grounds of opposition, the court finds that the Appellants’ have made a reasonable case for issuance of temporary injunction pending the hearing anddetermination of the appeal on condition that they continue paying all the monthly rent in accordance with the existing lease/Tenancy agreement.
6. That for reasons set out above the Appellants notice of motion dated 16th September 2016 is granted in terms of prayers 3 with costs in the cause on condition that the Appellants continue meeting the monthly obligations in terms of their lease/Tenancy agreement with the 1st Respondent.
Orders accordingly.
S.M. KIBUNJA
ENVIRONMENT & LAND – JUDGE
DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 2ND DAY OF MAY 2018
In presence of;
Appellants Absent
Respondents Absent
Counsel Mr. Onsongo for Odeny for Appellant
Mr. Onyango for Respondents
S.M. KIBUNJA
ENVIRONMENT & LAND – JUDGE