[2019] KEHC 5040 (KLR)
The court found that the sentence of three years imprisonment for the offence of shop breaking and committing a felony was both lawful and lenient. The applicant did not plead guilty and subjected the court and complainants to a full trial. Despite the mitigation and the probation officer's report, there were no...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 5040 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Edward Oyoo Olando; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 33 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
- Outcome
- application for sentence revision dismissed
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Revision, Shop Breaking, Felony Conviction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edward Oyoo Olando
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of three years imprisonment imposed on the applicant for shop breaking and committing a felony should be revised.
- 2 Whether the applicant's mitigation and the probation officer's report warrant a reduction or alteration of the sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the sentence of three years imprisonment for the offence of shop breaking and committing a felony was both lawful and lenient. The applicant did not plead guilty and subjected the court and complainants to a full trial. Despite the mitigation and the probation officer's report, there were no sufficient grounds to warrant interference with the sentence. The application for revision was therefore dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to serve the full sentence, subject to remission qualification.
Court Disposition
application for sentence revision dismissed
Orders
- The application for revision of sentence is dismissed.
- Applicants/Convicts to serve full sentence subject to remission qualification.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT SIAYA
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 33 OF 2019
(CORAM: HON. R.E. ABURILI - J)
EDWARD OYOO OLANDO...............................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC.......................................................................................RESPONDENT
(An Application seeking Revision of Sentence from Judgment delivered
at Bondo Law Court on 21/2/2019 vide Criminal Case 1066 of 2018
before Hon. E.N. Wasike, SRM)
RULING
1. I have considered the application for sentence revision and the grounds thereof. I have also considered the Probation Officer’s Report filed on 23/7/2019.
2. I have taken into consideration the fact that the convict did not plead guilty to the offences charged and took the court and the complainants through the motions of a long hearing for the offence of shop breaking and committing a felony.
3. Despite the mitigations now being placed before the court, I am not satisfied that the Applicants deserve sentence revision as the sentence of three years imprisonment meted out was very lenient and lawful. I decline the applications for revision of sentence and dismiss the same.
4. Applicants/Convicts to serve full sentence subject to remission qualification.
Dated, signed and Delivered at Siaya, this 29th Day of July 2019.
R.E. ABURILI
JUDGE