[2018] KEELC 3272 (KLR)
The Environment and Land Court is the proper forum for enforcement of the Court of Appeal judgment concerning land disputes, as mandated by the Appellate Jurisdiction Act and the Constitution. The plaintiffs' application for eviction and enforcement is unopposed, and the court is satisfied that the orders sought are...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELC 3272 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Edwin G. K. Thiongo; Plaintiff: Waweru Holdings Limited; Defendant: Gichuru Kinuthia; Defendant: Patterson Njoroge; Defendant: John Ngethe Gichuru
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 624 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Post Judgment Enforcement
- Outcome
- Application allowed; eviction and enforcement orders granted.
- Judges
- BM Eboso
- Legal Topics
- Eviction Orders, Enforcement of Judgments, Execution Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edwin G. K. Thiongo
Plaintiff
Waweru Holdings Limited
Plaintiff
Gichuru Kinuthia
Defendant
Patterson Njoroge
Defendant
John Ngethe Gichuru
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Post Judgment Enforcement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Environment and Land Court is the proper forum to enforce the Court of Appeal judgment relating to land parcels Dagoretti/Thogoto/1191 and 1192.
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to eviction orders against the defendants in execution of the Court of Appeal judgment.
- 3 Whether the Officer Commanding Kikuyu Police Station should supervise the eviction process.
Ratio Decidendi
The Environment and Land Court is the proper forum for enforcement of the Court of Appeal judgment concerning land disputes, as mandated by the Appellate Jurisdiction Act and the Constitution. The plaintiffs' application for eviction and enforcement is unopposed, and the court is satisfied that the orders sought are in line with the judgment of the Court of Appeal. The court grants the application, authorizing the Officer Commanding Kikuyu Police Station to oversee the eviction and directing the court registry to issue formal warrants of execution. Execution must comply strictly with the law, and the defendants are to bear the costs of the application.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; eviction and enforcement orders granted.
Orders
- The Officer Commanding Kikuyu Police Station shall oversee enforcement of the Court of Appeal judgment dated 30/10/2015 and the extracted order issued on 16/3/2017.
- The Environment and Land Court Registry shall issue formal warrants of execution to appropriate licensed officers and the Officer Commanding Kikuyu Police Station authorizing execution/enforcement of the Court of Appeal judgment/order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI
ELC CASE NO. 624 OF 2007
EDWIN G. K. THIONGO............................................1ST PLAINTIFF
WAWERU HOLDINGS LIMITED............................2ND PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
GICHURU KINUTHIA..........................................1ST DEFENDANT
PATTERSON NJOROGE........................................2ND DEFENDANT
JOHN NGETHE GICHURU...................................3RD DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
1. Judgment in this suit was delivered in favour of the defendants by Osiemo J on 14/9/2006. Dissatisfied with the judgment, the plaintiffs lodged an appeal in the Court of Appeal. On 30/10/2015, the Court of Appeal (Shichale, Otieno-Odek and Kantai JJA) delivered a judgment on the appeal, allowing the appeal and setting aside the judgment of Osiemo J. For avoidance of doubt, the final orders of the Court of Appeal read thus:
We believe we have said enough to show that this appeal is for allowing. Accordingly, we allow the appeal and set aside the judgment of the learned judge dated 14th September 2006. The respondents to vacate land parcels Dagoretti/Thogoto/1191 and Dagoretti/Thogoto/1192 within 6 months from today’s date. Given the nature of the case, we direct that each of the parties shall bear his/her own costs.
2. On 16/3/2017, a formal extract of the judgment was issued by the Registrar of the Court of Appeal. Both the judgment and the extracted order are annexed to the Further Affidavit sworn by Edwin G K Thiongo and filed in court on 29/6/2017 pursuant to an order made by this court on 12/6/2017.
3. On 28/4/2017, the plaintiffs brought a Notice of Motion dated 31/3/2017 seeking the following orders;
a) An order of eviction of Gichuru Kinuthia, Patterson Njoroge and John Ngethe Gichuru from Land Parcel Nos Dagoretti/Thogoto/1191 and Dagoretti/Thogoto/1191 be and is hereby issued.
b) The eviction of the said Gichuru Kinuthia, Petterson Njoroge and John Ngethe from land parcel Nos Dagoretti/Thogoto/1192 and Dagoretti/Thogoto/1192 be supervised by the Officer Commanding Station (O C S) Kikuyu Police Station.
c) Costs of this application be provided for.
4. The application was served on the defendants’ advocate based at Kituo Cha Sheria but no response has been raised against the application.
5. The court has considered the material application. The tenor and import of the application is that it seeks execution and enforcement of the judgment of the Court of Appeal. Execution/enforcement of judgments of the Court of Appeal is covered by the legal framework in Section 4 of the Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act which provides thus:
Any judgment of the Court of Appeal given in exercise of its jurisdiction under this Act may be executed and enforced as if it were a judgment of the High Court.
6. The “High Court” in the above legal framework is to be construed with the necessary alterations and adaptations to conform with the post 2010 architecture of Kenya’s court system and within the constitutional framework in Section 33 of the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution relating to succession of institutions. The successor court to the pre-2010 high court in relation to land disputes is the Environment and Land Court. The court is therefore satisfied that this court is the proper forum through which to enforce the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
7. As noted in the preceding paragraphs, the decree holder’s application is unopposed. Consequently, in the absence of any opposition from the defendants, the plaintiffs’ application dated 31/3/2017 seeking execution/ enforcement of the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated 30/10/2015 is allowed in the following terms:
(a) The Police Officer Commanding Kikuyu Police Station shall oversee the plaintiffs’ enforcement of the Court of Appeal Judgment dated 30/10/2015 and the formal extracted order issued on 16/3/2017.
(b) The Environment and Land Court Registry shall issue formal warrants of execution to appropriate licensed officers of the Court and to the Officer Commanding Kikuyu Police Station authorizing them to execute and/or enforce the judgment/order of the Court of Appeal as ordered by the Court of Appeal.
(c) Execution shall be carried out in strict compliance with the law.
(d) The defendants shall bear costs of this application.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI ON THIS 18TH DAY OF MAY 2018.
…………………….
B M EBOSO
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Mr Kinyua holding brief for Mr Ndumu Kimani Advocate for the Plaintiff
No appearance for the Defendant
Ms. Kajuju - Court clerk